Literature DB >> 21182153

Guideline-conformity of initiation with oral hypoglycemic treatment for patients with newly therapy-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus in Austria.

Wolfgang C Winkelmayer1, Margaret R Stedman, Michaela Pogantsch, Peter Wieninger, Anna Bucsics, Markus Asslaber, Rosemarie Bauer, Thomas Burkhardt, Alexandra Schautzer, M Alan Brookhart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine guideline conformity of initiation of oral hypoglycemic (OH) treatment for type 2 diabetes in Austria; to study patient and prescriber correlates of recommended initiation with metformin monotherapy.
METHODS: We used claims from 11 sickness funds that covered 7.5 million individuals, representing >90% of the Austrian population. First-time OH use was defined as a first filled prescription after one year without any OH drug or insulin. Among these incident users, we described the OH drug class used and defined correlates of initiation with metformin monotherapy.
RESULTS: From 1/2007 to 6/2008, we identified 42,882 incident users of an OH drug: 70.8% used metformin, 24.7% used a sulfonylurea, and 4.5% initiated treatment with another class. We estimated the incidence of OH-dependent type 2 diabetes at 3.8-4.4 per 1000 patient-years. We conducted multivariate analyses among 39 077 patients with available prescriber information. Independent correlates of initiation with metformin were younger age, female gender, waived co-payment, more recent initiation, fewer hospital days and more therapeutic classes received in the year prior to first OH therapy (all p < 0.001). Prescriber specialty and age (p < 0.001), but not gender, were also associated with metformin initiation. Approximately 20% of metformin initiators had a second OH drug added within <18 months. While we were unable to ascertain specific contraindications to metformin (renal insufficiency, hepatic failure), <10% of the general population are expected to have these conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Seventy per cent of new initiators of OH treatment in Austria received metformin as recommended by international guidelines. At least 20% did not, taking into account possible contraindications, which provides an opportunity for intervention.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21182153     DOI: 10.1002/pds.2059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the Austrian disease management programme "Therapie Aktiv" for type 2 diabetes regarding the improvement of metabolic control, risk profile and guideline adherence: 2 years of follow up.

Authors:  Maria Flamm; Sigrid Panisch; Henrike Winkler; Tim Johansson; Raimund Weitgasser; Andreas C Sönnichsen
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Metformin: Sex/Gender Differences in Its Uses and Effects-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ioannis Ilias; Manfredi Rizzo; Lina Zabuliene
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.