PURPOSE: To analyze and compare three quantitative MRI methods to determine the degree of muscle involvement in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Muscle fat content (MFC) was determined based on water-fat quantification using a 2-point Dixon (2PD) method and on a histogram analysis of the free induction decay (FID) signal of a gradient-spoiled steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence. In addition, transverse relaxation times (T₂) of muscle tissue were calculated using a monoexponential decay model. RESULTS: We observed an increased mean MFC in OPMD patients as compared to healthy controls with the adductor magnus and soleus muscles being the most involved muscles in the thigh and calf, respectively. Furthermore, strong correlations (0.78 < R² < 0.94) between different quantitative MR methods were observed. Fewer outliers, however, were obtained by the 2PD method and T₂ measurements, suggesting these methods being superior to the SSFP-FID method. CONCLUSION: Quantitative MR techniques, such as fast multiecho Dixon methods and T₂ imaging, can reliably differentiate between healthy and dystrophic muscles in OPMD, even if muscles are only marginally affected. Quantitative methods thus represent a promising tool that may be able to monitor more objectively the individual disease progression and treatment response in future clinical trials in muscular dystrophies.
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare three quantitative MRI methods to determine the degree of muscle involvement in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Muscle fat content (MFC) was determined based on water-fat quantification using a 2-point Dixon (2PD) method and on a histogram analysis of the free induction decay (FID) signal of a gradient-spoiled steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence. In addition, transverse relaxation times (T₂) of muscle tissue were calculated using a monoexponential decay model. RESULTS: We observed an increased mean MFC in OPMDpatients as compared to healthy controls with the adductor magnus and soleus muscles being the most involved muscles in the thigh and calf, respectively. Furthermore, strong correlations (0.78 < R² < 0.94) between different quantitative MR methods were observed. Fewer outliers, however, were obtained by the 2PD method and T₂ measurements, suggesting these methods being superior to the SSFP-FID method. CONCLUSION: Quantitative MR techniques, such as fast multiecho Dixon methods and T₂ imaging, can reliably differentiate between healthy and dystrophic muscles in OPMD, even if muscles are only marginally affected. Quantitative methods thus represent a promising tool that may be able to monitor more objectively the individual disease progression and treatment response in future clinical trials in muscular dystrophies.
Authors: Bruce M Damon; Ke Li; Richard D Dortch; E Brian Welch; Jane H Park; Amanda K W Buck; Theodore F Towse; Mark D Does; Daniel F Gochberg; Nathan D Bryant Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2016-12-18 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Norman Espinosa; Dimitri A Raptis; Florian M Buck Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Arjun Thanabalasingam; Sebastian Winklhofer; Michael Betz; Ulrike Held; Roman Guggenberger Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum; Lorenzo Nardo; Hamza Alizai; Huanzhou Yu; Julio Carballido-Gamio; S Paran Yap; Ann Shimakawa; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sean C Forbes; Donovan J Lott; Richard S Finkel; Claudia Senesac; Barry J Byrne; H Lee Sweeney; Glenn A Walter; Krista Vandenborne Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: R J Willcocks; I A Arpan; S C Forbes; D J Lott; C R Senesac; E Senesac; J Deol; W T Triplett; C Baligand; M J Daniels; H L Sweeney; G A Walter; K Vandenborne Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 4.296