Literature DB >> 21181590

Effect of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 moments in manual lifting is dependent on task type and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies.

Gert S Faber1, Idsart Kingma, Jaap H van Dieën.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether the effects of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 total moment (PTM) are affected by task type or familiarity with alternative lifting strategies during manual lifting. Nine subjects lifted low-lying boxes from far and close initial horizontal positions in a typical laboratory lifting task (without any transportation of the load) and in a more realistic lifting task in which the box was transported to a location at a few metres distance. Subsequently, subjects were familiarised with alternative lifting strategies (e.g. shifting and tilting) and they then repeated the more realistic lifting task. Compared with the typical laboratory lifting task, the more realistic lifting task resulted in 6% larger PTMs for the close-positioned box. Familiarisation with alternative lifting techniques resulted in a 10% reduction in PTMs for the far-positioned box. As a result, the effect of initial horizontal box position on PTMs was smaller for the more realistic lifting task than for the typical laboratory lifting task and vanished after familiarisation with alternative lifting strategies. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: This study showed that the effect of horizontal box position on peak L5/S1 moments is dependent on the type of lifting task (comparing a typical laboratory simulated lifting task with a more realistic task involving carrying the load for a short distance) and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies. Therefore, it is recommended that back loading should be evaluated in a realistic simulation of the work situation or at the workplace itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21181590     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.535019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Two linear regression models predicting cumulative dynamic L5/S1 joint moment during a range of lifting tasks based on static postures.

Authors:  Xu Xu; Chien-Chi Chang; Ming-Lun Lu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Angular Velocity, Moment, and Power Analysis of the Ankle, Knee, and Hip Joints in the Goalkeeper's Diving Save in Football.

Authors:  Rony Ibrahim; Idsart Kingma; Vosse de Boode; Gert S Faber; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-02-28

3.  The Effect of Prosthetic Alignment on Prosthetic and Total Leg Stiffness While Running With Simulated Running-Specific Prostheses.

Authors:  Ashley Groothuis; Han Houdijk
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-08-22

4.  The Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability of a Video-Based Posture-Matching Tool to Estimate Cumulative Loads on the Lower Back.

Authors:  Saeed Ghaneh-Ezabadi; Mohammad Abdoli-Eramaki; Navid Arjmand; Alireza Abouhossein; Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  Influence of Load Knowledge on Biomechanics of Asymmetric Lifting.

Authors:  Junshi Liu; Xingda Qu; Yipeng Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The Importance of Lifting Height and Load Mass for Muscular Workload during Supermarket Stocking: Cross-Sectional Field Study.

Authors:  Sebastian Venge Skovlund; Rúni Bláfoss; Sebastian Skals; Markus Due Jakobsen; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The use of electromyography and kinematic measurements of the lumbar spine during ergonomic intervention among workers of the production line of a foundry.

Authors:  Anna Błaszczyk; Małgorzata B Ogurkowska
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.