Literature DB >> 21181513

Quality by design and process analytical technology for sterile products--where are we now?

Bryan S Riley1, Xuhong Li.   

Abstract

Quality by design (QbD) and process analytical technology (PAT) have become priorities for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Numerous recent initiatives within CDER and FDA have had the objective of encouraging the pharmaceutical industry to utilize QbD and PAT in their product development and manufacturing processes. Although sterile products may be a minority compared to non-sterile dosage forms (e.g., solid orals), their absolute requirement for sterility make design and control of the manufacturing processes extremely critical. This emphasis on the manufacturing process makes the sterile drug product an obvious target for QbD and PAT. Although the FDA encourages QbD submissions, the utilization of QbD and PAT for sterile products so far is still limited. This paper will examine the present state of QbD and PAT for sterile products and review some examples currently in use. Additional potential applications of QbD and PAT for sterile product development and manufacturing will also be discussed.
© 2010 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21181513      PMCID: PMC3066341          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-010-9566-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  4 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative risk modeling in aseptic manufacture.

Authors:  Edward C Tidswell; Bernard McGarvey
Journal:  PDA J Pharm Sci Technol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

2.  Enumeration of airborne bacteria and fungi using solid phase cytometry.

Authors:  Lies M E Vanhee; Hans J Nelis; Tom Coenye
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control.

Authors:  Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  A multicenter comparison study between the Endosafe PTS rapid-release testing system and traditional methods for detecting endotoxin in cell-therapy products.

Authors:  A P Gee; D Sumstad; J Stanson; P Watson; J Proctor; D Kadidlo; E Koch; J Sprague; D Wood; D Styers; D McKenna; J Gallelli; D Griffin; E J Read; B Parish; R Lindblad
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.414

  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Concise Review: Process Development Considerations for Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Andrew Campbell; Thomas Brieva; Lior Raviv; Jon Rowley; Knut Niss; Harvey Brandwein; Steve Oh; Ohad Karnieli
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 2.  Quality-by-design in hot melt extrusion based amorphous solid dispersions: An industrial perspective on product development.

Authors:  Arun Butreddy; Suresh Bandari; Michael A Repka
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 3.  Nanomedicine: Principles, Properties, and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Sara Soares; João Sousa; Alberto Pais; Carla Vitorino
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.221

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.