Literature DB >> 21181292

Chemical form of selenium affects its uptake, transport, and glutathione peroxidase activity in the human intestinal Caco-2 cell model.

Huawei Zeng1, Matthew I Jackson, Wen-Hsing Cheng, Gerald F Combs.   

Abstract

Determining the effect of selenium (Se) chemical form on uptake, transport, and glutathione peroxidase activity in human intestinal cells is critical to assess Se bioavailability at nutritional doses. In this study, we found that two sources of L-selenomethionine (SeMet) and Se-enriched yeast each increased intracellular Se content more effectively than selenite or methylselenocysteine (SeMSC) in the human intestinal Caco-2 cell model. Interestingly, SeMSC, SeMet, and digested Se-enriched yeast were transported at comparable efficacy from the apical to basolateral sides, each being about 3-fold that of selenite. In addition, these forms of Se, whether before or after traversing from apical side to basolateral side, did not change the potential to support glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity. Although selenoprotein P has been postulated to be a key Se transport protein, its intracellular expression did not differ when selenite, SeMSC, SeMet, or digested Se-enriched yeast was added to serum-contained media. Taken together, our data show, for the first time, that the chemical form of Se at nutritional doses can affect the absorptive (apical to basolateral side) efficacy and retention of Se by intestinal cells; but that, these effects are not directly correlated to the potential to support GPx activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21181292     DOI: 10.1007/s12011-010-8935-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res        ISSN: 0163-4984            Impact factor:   3.738


  7 in total

Review 1.  Does a role for selenium in DNA damage repair explain apparent controversies in its use in chemoprevention?

Authors:  Soumen Bera; Viviana De Rosa; Walid Rachidi; Alan M Diamond
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Selenium-enriched foods are more effective at increasing glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity compared with selenomethionine: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma N Bermingham; John E Hesketh; Bruce R Sinclair; John P Koolaard; Nicole C Roy
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Loss of Selenium-Binding Protein 1 Decreases Sensitivity to Clastogens and Intracellular Selenium Content in HeLa Cells.

Authors:  Changhui Zhao; Huawei Zeng; Ryan T Y Wu; Wen-Hsing Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Bioavailability Comparison of Nine Bioselenocompounds In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Kazuaki Takahashi; Noriyuki Suzuki; Yasumitsu Ogra
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Phytoglycogen Nanoparticle Delivery System for Inorganic Selenium Reduces Cytotoxicity without Impairing Selenium Bioavailability.

Authors:  Tamiru N Alkie; Jondavid de Jong; Emily Moore; Stephanie J DeWitte-Orr
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Prostatic response to supranutritional selenium supplementation: comparison of the target tissue potency of selenomethionine vs. selenium-yeast on markers of prostatic homeostasis.

Authors:  David J Waters; Shuren Shen; Seema S Kengeri; Emily C Chiang; Gerald F Combs; J Steven Morris; David G Bostwick
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Methylseleninic acid sensitizes Notch3-activated OVCA429 ovarian cancer cells to carboplatin.

Authors:  Tiffany J Tzeng; Lei Cao; YangXin Fu; Huawei Zeng; Wen-Hsing Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.