Literature DB >> 21180684

Clinical evaluation of Tiny® 2.5- and 3.0-mm narrow-diameter implants as definitive implants in different clinical situations: a retrospective cohort study.

Eduardo Anitua1, Jose M Errazquin, José de Pedro, Pedro Barrio, Leire Begoña, Gorka Orive.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess retrospectively the survival of narrow-diameter implants (2.5 and 3 mm in diameter) in patients with insufficient bone ridge thickness for placement of standard-diameter implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with 89 inserted narrow-diameter implants (2.5 and 3.0 mm) were included. Patients were treated with one or more narrow-diameter implants between June 2004 and December 2005. The observation period for all included implants was at least 3 years after implant loading. Outcome measures were implant survival, complications and marginal bone level changes evaluated on panoramic radiographs.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period for all implants was 48 months. Only one implant was lost, yielding survival rates of 98.9% and 98.0% for the implant- and subject-based analyses, respectively. Six complications were reported. Twenty-four months after implant insertion, mean bone loss was 1.26 mm (SD 0.51).
CONCLUSIONS: Narrow-diameter implants can be successfully used to treat narrow bone ridges up to 3 years after loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21180684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  4 in total

1.  Tissue-supported dental implant prosthesis (overdenture): the search for the ideal protocol. A literature review.

Authors:  Domenica Laurito; Luca Lamazza; Michael J Spink; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-05-03

2.  Bone loss around narrow implants versus standard diameter implants: Retrospective 2-years case-control study.

Authors:  José-Ramón Corcuera-Flores; Manuel Pérez-Fierro; Andrés Blanco-Carrión; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Lizett Castellanos-Cosano; Guillermo Machuca-Portillo
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Carlos Pérez-Albacete; Antonio Aguilar-Salvatierra; José E de Val Maté-Sánchez; Rafael A Delgado-Ruiz; Marcus Abboud; Eugenio Velasco; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Narrow implants (2.75 and 3.25 mm diameter) supporting a fixed splinted prostheses in posterior regions of mandible: one-year results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tommaso Grandi; Luigi Svezia; Giovanni Grandi
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-09-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.