Literature DB >> 21180683

Outcome of dental implants in patients with and without a history of periodontitis: a 5-year pragmatic multicentre retrospective cohort study of 1727 patients.

Rodolfo Gianserra1, Raffaele Cavalcanti, Francesco Oreglia, Massimo Francesco Manfredonia, Marco Esposito.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the outcome of dental implants placed in patients with a history of periodontitis. Patients with no or mild history of periodontitis served as controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1727 patients were consecutively treated in four private practices. Patients were divided into three groups according to their initial periodontal conditions assessed with a modified periodontal screening and recording (PSR) index: 630 patients were in the severe periodontitis (SP) group, 839 in the moderate periodontitis (MP) group, and 258 had no periodontitis (NP). Patients requiring periodontal treatment were treated prior to implantation. Various implant systems and procedures were used. In total, 3260 implants and 1707 implant-supported prostheses were placed in the SP group, 2813 implants and 1744 implant-supported prostheses in the MP group, and 647 implants and 424 implant-supported prostheses in the NP group. Mixed implant–tooth supported prostheses (98 prostheses in 89 patients) were not considered. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant survival.
RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty patients were lost to follow-up 5 years after loading. Regarding prosthesis failures, 13 prostheses could not be placed or failed in 13 patients of the SP group (0.8%), 11 prostheses could not be placed or failed in 9 patients of the MP group (0.7%), and 3 prostheses failed in 3 patients of the NP group (0.9%). For implant failures, 130 (4.5%) implants failed in the SP group, 74 (3.1%) implants failed in the MP group, and 15 (3.0%) implants failed in the NP group. Most of the implant failures (90%) occurred before implant loading. Fitting a logistic regression for early implant failures and total implant failures, taking into account the clustering of implants in patients, there were no statistically significant differences between the three PSR groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the retrospective nature of this study, conclusions need to be interpreted with caution. A previous history of periodontal disease may not have a significant impact on implant failures up to 5 years after loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21180683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  3 in total

1.  Development of a new preclinical model to study early implant loss: a validation study in the beagle dog.

Authors:  Antonio Liñares; Raul Verdeja; Benjamin Pippenger; Fernando Muñoz; Mónica López-Peña; Juan Blanco
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Antibiotics prescribing practices in oral implantology among jordanian dentists. A cross sectional, observational study.

Authors:  Ashraf E Abukaraky; Khaldoon Abu Afifeh; Adel A Khatib; Nadiajda O Khdairi; Hanan M Habarneh; Waleed Kh Ahmad; Ahmad As Hamdan; Faleh A Sawair
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-07-28

3.  Factors affecting the early failure of implants placed in a dental practice with a specialization in implantology - a retrospective study.

Authors:  Johannes Krisam; Larissa Ott; Stephanie Schmitz; Anna-Luisa Klotz; Aida Seyidaliyeva; Peter Rammelsberg; Andreas Zenthöfer
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.757

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.