| Literature DB >> 21180471 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the methanolic extract of Erythrina variegata (Linn.) var Orientalis (Fabaceae) seeds (MEEV) in reducing the cholesterol levels and as well as antioxidant in experimentally induced hyperlipidemic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant enzymes; Erythrina variegata; HMG-CoA reductase; high fat diet; lipid profile; β-sitosterol
Year: 2010 PMID: 21180471 PMCID: PMC2996074 DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.72139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci ISSN: 0975-7406
Effect of MEEV on lipid parameters, body weight, and fat pad weight in normal and hypercholesterolemic rats
| Parameters | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mg/dl) | 79.25±0.42 | 203.80±0.49a | 162.16±0.45b | 143.61±0.49b | 73.30±0.33b |
| TG (mg/dl) | 58.9±0.74 | 135.1±0.37a | 115.6±0.42b | 109.1±0.51b | 55.3±0.19b |
| HDL-c (mg/dl) | 29.32±0.63 | 15.00±0.41a | 16.16±0.80bNS | 16.82±0.28bNS | 17.02±0.21b |
| LDL-c (mg/dl) | 73.34±0.48 | 179.78±0.97a | 142.48±0.48b | 125.19±0.41b | 65.64±0.63b |
| VLDL-c (mg/dl) | 11.78±0.54 | 27.01±0.65a | 23.52±0.88b | 21.82±1.02b | 11.06±1.03b |
| Atherogenic index | 2.70±0.54 | 13.58±0.42a | 10.03±0.64b | 8.53±0.56b | 4.30±0.74b |
| HMG-CoA/Mevalonate ratio | 11.24±0.83 | 3.31±0.12a | 5.86±0.34b | 7.32±0.49b | 7.89±0.37b |
| Body weight (g) | 249.67±4.12 | 327.57±5.89a | 284.24±4.43b | 269.16±2.72b | 233.84±3.44b |
| Mesenteric fat pad weight (g) | 0.28±0.12 | 0.87±0.29a | 0.40±0.03b | 0.31±0.18b | 0.17±0.08b |
Values are mean ± SEM, n=6 animals in each group. Comparisons were made between: a, group I vs. II and b, group II vs. III, IV, and V. Symbols represent statistical significance:
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001
Effect of MEEV on antioxidant enzymes in normal and hypercholesterolemic rats
| Parameters | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (Units/mg of protein) | 6.90±0.10 | 3.13±0.12a | 4.36±0.16b | 4.69±0.12b | 5.65±0.17b |
| CAT (n moles of H2O2 decomposed/mg of protein) | 44.60±1.32 | 22.24±1.25a | 31.18±1.47b | 36.75±1.31b | 39.28±1.33b |
| LPO (n moles of TBRAS/mg of protein) | 2.72±0.04 | 4.40±0.05a | 3.80±0.06b | 3.20±0.06b | 2.90±0.06b |
Values are mean ± SEM, n=6 animals in each group. Comparisons were made between: a, group I vs. II and b, group II vs. III, IV, and V. Symbols represent statistical significance:
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001