Literature DB >> 21178632

Indications and outcomes of laparoscopic uretero-renal stone surgery.

Lukas Lusuardi1, Günther Janetschek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although most ureteral and urinary stones are managed using endourologic techniques or shockwave lithotripsy in daily clinical practice, stone surgery has not completely disappeared. Laparoscopy, another minimally invasive treatment, is continuously gaining place in the treatment of urinary stones, mainly replacing open surgery. RECENT
FINDINGS: Indications for open or laparoscopic stone surgery are anatomic abnormalities, such as horseshoe kidneys, malrotated kidneys, ureteropelvic junction obstruction with stones, or ectopic kidneys; symptomatic stones in diverticula; extremely large stones and all those situations in which conventional endourologic procedures and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy are not available or were unsuccessful or in those conditions where laparoscopy offers a priori the best solution to an endourologic complex condition.
SUMMARY: Laparoscopic surgery is effective for complex urinary stones and allows adjunctive procedures. It complements other minimally invasive procedures, and a need for open surgery has strongly diminished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21178632     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283430afc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for a solitary renal pelvis stone larger than 3 cm: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Mohammad-Mehdi Hosseini; Abbasali Khakbaz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Laparoendoscopic single-site pyelolithotomy with use of a carter-thomason needle grasper.

Authors:  Ill Young Seo; Joung Sik Rim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-03-15

3.  Simultaneous laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal lithiasis: the combined experience of two academic centers and review of the literature.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Stilianos Giannakopoulos; Stavros I Tyritzis; Aristeides Alevizopoulos; Stefanos Papadoukakis; Stavros Touloupidis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2014-05-20

4.  Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kadihasanoglu; Ugur Yucetas; Emre Karabay; Erkan Sonmezay
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.