Literature DB >> 21178068

Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.

Hiroko Satake1, Akiko Nishio, Mitsuru Ikeda, Satoko Ishigaki, Kazuhiro Shimamoto, Maki Hirano, Shinji Naganawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to predict malignancy of breast masses, with subsequent recommendation for biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 115 breast masses classified as BI-RADS category 4 or 5, which were assessed according to combined findings of mammography, B-mode sonography, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, two radiologists retrospectively evaluated the elasticity scores using ultrasound elastography and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values using MR DWI. The diagnostic abilities of these two techniques were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: In the analysis of all 115 breast masses, the elasticity score was predictive of malignancy, whereas the ADC value was not independently predictive. In an analysis of the 52 masses assessed as BI-RADS category 4, the elasticity score was found to be a significant predictor of malignancy, compared with the ADC value, which was a nonsignificant predictor. In an analysis of the 63 masses assessed as BI-RADS category 5, neither the elasticity score nor the ADC value was a significant predictor of malignancy.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that elasticity imaging provides relatively reliable predictions for malignancy, especially in BI-RADS category 4 masses, compared with MR DWI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21178068     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.4108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of ADCs in different ROIs for breast lesions.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Guan-Qiao Jin; Jun-Jie Liu; Dan-Ke Su; Ning-Bin Luo; Dong Xie; Shao-Lv Lai; Xiang-Yang Huang; Wei-Li Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) with technetium-99m sestamibi in the diagnosis of small breast cancer and axillary lymph node involvement.

Authors:  Alessandro DeCesare; Alessandro de Cesare; Giuseppe De Vincentis; De Vincentis Giuseppe; Stefano Gervasi; Gervasi Stefano; Giacomo Crescentini; Crescentini Giacomo; Enrico Fiori; Fiori Enrico; Marco Bonomi; Bonomi Marco; Alessandro Crocetti; Alessandro Crocetti; Antonio V Sterpetti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Correlation of Tumoral Prognostic Factors by Sonoelastography Score in Patients to be Operated Due to Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Aykut Soyder; Füsun Taşkın; İmran Kurt Ömürlü; Serdar Özbaş
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in women with locally advanced breast cancer using ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Omar Falou; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Sameera Prematilake; Ervis Sofroni; Naum Papanicolau; Sara Iradji; Zahra Jahedmotlagh; Sharon Lemon-Wong; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Eileen Rakovitch; Judit Zubovits; Jacqueline Spayne; Rebecca Dent; Maureen Trudeau; Jean Francois Boileau; Frances C Wright; Martin J Yaffe; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Breast ultrasound tomography versus MRI for clinical display of anatomy and tumor rendering: preliminary results.

Authors:  Bryan Ranger; Peter J Littrup; Nebojsa Duric; Priti Chandiwala-Mody; Cuiping Li; Steven Schmidt; Jessica Lupinacci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Margaretha Rudas; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  An evaluation of ocular elasticity using real-time ultrasound elastography in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Kadir Agladioglu; Gökhan Pekel; Seher Altintas Kasikci; Ramazan Yagci; Yilmaz Kiroglu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A Vermoolen; T C Kwee; R A J Nievelstein
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-06-07

10.  Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value

Authors:  Masoumeh Gity; Behnaz Moradi; Rasool Arami; Ali Arabkheradmand; Mohamad Ali Kazemi
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.