Literature DB >> 21177748

A comparative study of quantitative immunohistochemistry and quantum dot immunohistochemistry for mutation carrier identification in Lynch syndrome.

Emma Barrow1, D Gareth Evans, Ray McMahon, James Hill, Richard Byers.   

Abstract

AIMS: Lynch Syndrome is caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Mutation carrier identification is facilitated by immunohistochemical detection of the MMR proteins MHL1 and MSH2 in tumour tissue and is desirable as colonoscopic screening reduces mortality. However, protein detection by conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) is subjective, and quantitative techniques are required. Quantum dots (QDs) are novel fluorescent labels that enable quantitative multiplex staining. This study compared their use with quantitative 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) IHC for the diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome.
METHODS: Tumour sections from 36 mutation carriers and six controls were obtained. These were stained with DAB on an automated platform using antibodies against MLH1 and MSH2. Multiplex QD immunofluorescent staining of the sections was performed using antibodies against MLH1, MSH2 and smooth muscle actin (SMA). Multispectral analysis of the slides was performed. The staining intensity of DAB and QDs was measured in multiple colonic crypts, and the mean intensity scores calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of staining performance for the identification of mutation carriers were evaluated.
RESULTS: For quantitative DAB IHC, the area under the MLH1 ROC curve was 0.872 (95% CI 0.763 to 0.981), and the area under the MSH2 ROC curve was 0.832 (95% CI 0.704 to 0.960). For quantitative QD IHC, the area under the MLH1 ROC curve was 0.812 (95% CI 0.681 to 0.943), and the area under the MSH2 ROC curve was 0.598 (95% CI 0.418 to 0.777).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantage of QD staining to enable several markers to be measured simultaneously, it is of lower utility than DAB IHC for the identification of MMR mutation carriers. Automated DAB IHC staining and quantitative slide analysis may enable high-throughput IHC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21177748     DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2010.084418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  4 in total

Review 1.  Quantum dots for quantitative imaging: from single molecules to tissue.

Authors:  Tania Q Vu; Wai Yan Lam; Ellen W Hatch; Diane S Lidke
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Application of nanotechnology in the early diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Shenghe Deng; Junnan Gu; Zhenxing Jiang; Yinghao Cao; Fuwei Mao; Yifan Xue; Jun Wang; Kun Dai; Le Qin; Ke Liu; Ke Wu; Qianyuan He; Kailin Cai
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 9.429

3.  Advances in genetic technologies result in improved diagnosis of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal and endometrial cancers.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; Fiona Lalloo; Neil Aj Ryan; Naomi Bowers; Kate Green; Emma R Woodward; Tara Clancy; James Bolton; Rhona J McVey; Andrew J Wallace; Katy Newton; James Hill; Raymond McMahon; Emma J Crosbie
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Assessment of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emma J Crosbie; Neil A J Ryan; Rhona J McVey; Fiona Lalloo; Naomi Bowers; Kate Green; Emma R Woodward; Tara Clancy; James Bolton; Andrew J Wallace; Raymond F McMahon; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 6.318

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.