Literature DB >> 21177711

The experience of using complementary therapies after a diagnosis of cancer: a qualitative synthesis.

Janet Smithson1, Nicky Britten, Charlotte Paterson, George Lewith, Maggie Evans.   

Abstract

This article describes a qualitative synthesis of published research on cancer patients' experiences of complementary therapies. We conducted a systematic search for qualitative studies on this subject published between 1998 and 2007. Twenty-six refereed journal articles met the inclusion criteria. These 26 articles were repeatedly read by the research team and key concepts emerging from them were identified. Differences and variations were examined in association with treatment, therapy type and by stage of cancer (early stage, mid-treatment, advanced cancer, palliative care and long term 'survivors'). Six overarching concepts were located, which describe the key aspects of patients' experiences of the use of complementary and alternative medicine after a diagnosis of cancer: Connection; Control; Well-being; Transformation; Integration; and Polarization. These are described in a 'line of argument' synthesis, and differences associated with treatment type and stage of disease are noted. The findings are presented in a table showing the six concepts according to treatment type and stage; as a composite story; and in a diagrammatic model showing the individual, practitioner and organizational levels. The synthesis identified various specific ways in which complementary therapies supported cancer patients, as well as occasional negative effects. The most notable barrier was the perceived polarization of complementary therapies and biomedicine; patients reported better experiences in integrated settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21177711     DOI: 10.1177/1363459310371081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health (London)        ISSN: 1363-4593


  11 in total

Review 1.  Integrating complementary medicine in supportive cancer care models across four continents.

Authors:  Eran Ben-Arye; Elad Schiff; Catherine Zollman; Peter Heusser; Pablo Mountford; Moshe Frenkel; Gil Bar-Sela; Ofer Lavie
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Addressing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Individuals With Cancer: An Integrative Review and Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lynda G Balneaves; Cody Z Watling; Emilie N Hayward; Brenda Ross; Jill Taylor-Brown; Antony Porcino; Tracy L O Truant
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Developing a patient-centered outcome measure for complementary and alternative medicine therapies II: refining content validity through cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Jennifer J Thompson; Kimberly L Kelly; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Allison L Hopkins; Colette M Sims; Stephen J Coons
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.659

4.  Developing a patient-centered outcome measure for complementary and alternative medicine therapies I: defining content and format.

Authors:  Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Mimi Nichter; Mark A Nichter; Kimberly L Kelly; Colette M Sims; Iris R Bell; Heide M Castañeda; Charles R Elder; Mary S Koithan; Elizabeth G Sutherland; Marja J Verhoef; Sarah L Warber; Stephen J Coons
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.659

5.  Cancer survivors' perspectives and experience on western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine treatment and rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ji-Wei Wang; Zhi-Qi Yang; Cong Liu; Si-Jia Chen; Qian Shen; Tian-Rui Zhang; Nancy S Partike; Zheng-Ping Yuan; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 6.  Quality of Life and Breast Cancer: How Can Mind⁻Body Exercise Therapies Help? An Overview Study.

Authors:  Anne Marie Lunde Husebø; Tormod Lunde Husebø
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-13

7.  Aromatherapy, massage and reflexology: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the perspectives from people with palliative care needs.

Authors:  Megan Armstrong; Kate Flemming; Nuriye Kupeli; Patrick Stone; Susie Wilkinson; Bridget Candy
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?

Authors:  Kath Wright; Su Golder; Kate Lewis-Light
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-26

9.  Positive patient experiences in an Australian integrative oncology centre.

Authors:  Bonnie J Furzer; Anna S Petterson; Kemi E Wright; Karen E Wallman; Timothy R Ackland; David J L Joske
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 10.  What are the implications for practice that arise from studies of medication taking? A systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Mohammed Ahmed Rashid; Nadia Llanwarne; Natalie Heyns; Fiona Walter; Jonathan Mant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.