Literature DB >> 21177468

Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems.

H Xin1, R S Gates, A R Green, F M Mitloehner, P A Moore, C M Wathes.   

Abstract

As part of a systemic assessment toward social sustainability of egg production, we have reviewed current knowledge about the environmental impacts of egg production systems and identified topics requiring further research. Currently, we know that 1) high-rise cage houses generally have poorer air quality and emit more ammonia than manure belt (MB) cage houses; 2) manure removal frequency in MB houses greatly affects ammonia emissions; 3) emissions from manure storage are largely affected by storage conditions, including ventilation rate, manure moisture content, air temperature, and stacking profile; 4) more baseline data on air emissions from high-rise and MB houses are being collected in the United States to complement earlier measurements; 5) noncage houses generally have poorer air quality (ammonia and dust levels) than cage houses; 6) noncage houses tend to be colder during cold weather due to a lower stocking density than caged houses, leading to greater feed and fuel energy use; 7) hens in noncage houses are less efficient in resource (feed, energy, and land) utilization, leading to a greater carbon footprint; 8) excessive application of hen manure to cropland can lead to nutrient runoff to water bodies; 9) hen manure on open (free) range may be subject to runoff during rainfall, although quantitative data are lacking; 10) mitigation technologies exist to reduce generation and emission of noxious gases and dust; however, work is needed to evaluate their economic feasibility and optimize design; and 11) dietary modification shows promise for mitigating emissions. Further research is needed on 1) indoor air quality, barn emissions, thermal conditions, and energy use in alternative hen housing systems (1-story floor, aviary, and enriched cage systems), along with conventional housing systems under different production conditions; 2) environmental footprint for different US egg production systems through life cycle assessment; 3) practical means to mitigate air emissions from different production systems; 4) process-based models for predicting air emissions and their fate; and 5) the interactions between air quality, housing system, worker health, and animal health and welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21177468     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  15 in total

1.  Ammonia production in poultry houses can affect health of humans, birds, and the environment-techniques for its reduction during poultry production.

Authors:  Sadia Naseem; Annie J King
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Life cycle energy use, costs, and greenhouse gas emission of broiler farms in different production systems in Iran-a case study of Alborz province.

Authors:  Seyyed Hassan Pishgar-Komleh; Asadollah Akram; Alireza Keyhani; Rosalie van Zelm
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Influence of dietary taurine and housing density on oviduct function in laying hens.

Authors:  Bin Dai; Yuan-shu Zhang; Zi-li Ma; Liu-hai Zheng; Shuang-jie Li; Xin-hong Dou; Jian-sen Gong; Jin-feng Miao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.

Authors:  T A Shepherd; Y Zhao; H Li; J P Stinn; M D Hayes; H Xin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Implementing small-scale poultry-for-nutrition projects: Successes and lessons learned.

Authors:  Stella Nordhagen; Rolf Klemm
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems may have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part II-Ammonia.

Authors:  Bruce David; Cecilie Mejdell; Virginie Michel; Vonne Lund; Randi Oppermann Moe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Three Cage Layer Housing Systems.

Authors:  Sébastien Fournel; Frédéric Pelletier; Stéphane Godbout; Robert Lagacé; John Feddes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  An RFID-Based Smart Nest Box: An Experimental Study of Laying Performance and Behavior of Individual Hens.

Authors:  Ying-Ren Chien; Yu-Xian Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Metagenomic Analysis of Chicken Gut Microbiota for Improving Metabolism and Health of Chickens - A Review.

Authors:  Ki Young Choi; Tae Kwon Lee; Woo Jun Sul
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Implications for Welfare, Productivity and Sustainability of the Variation in Reported Levels of Mortality for Laying Hen Flocks Kept in Different Housing Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Ten Studies.

Authors:  Claire A Weeks; Sarah L Lambton; Adrian G Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.