Literature DB >> 21177463

Field evaluation of the accuracy of vaccine deposition by two different commercially available in ovo injection systems.

C J Williams1, B A Hopkins.   

Abstract

The location of injection and vaccine deposition in ovo is known to be critical to the efficacy of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine protection against MD viral challenge. Vaccine deposition into the amniotic sac or a s.c. or i.m. site of the embryo is required for MD vaccine efficacy. Vaccine deposition into the air cell or allantoic fluid results in chicks that are not adequately protected against subsequent MD viral challenge. A study was conducted in 2 commercial broiler hatcheries to evaluate the ability of 2 in ovo injection systems, the Embrex Inovoject system (Pfizer Poultry Health, Research Triangle Park, NC) and the Intelliject system (Avitech, Salisbury, MD; distributed by Merial Ltd., Gainesville, GA) to deliver a vaccine approved for use in ovo accurately and properly. A standard MD vaccine diluent mixed with a protein-staining dye was delivered through each machine to simulate in ovo vaccination. The location of the dye within the egg determined whether the vaccine was delivered correctly. Each egg was also evaluated for normal embryo development (normal eggs). Correct vaccine delivery included eggs in which the vaccine was injected into the amniotic sac or into s.c. or i.m. regions of the embryo. Incorrect vaccine delivery was defined as delivery into the air cell; allantoic sac; any combinations including air cell or allantois; the abdominal, cranial, orbital, or thoracic cavities of the embryo; or no vaccine delivery at all. In hatchery 1 (Chick Master, Newton, MS) 1,171 normal eggs were processed through the Inovoject system and 1,138 eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 94.62% of the normal eggs as compared with 61.16% delivery accuracy of normal eggs with the Intelliject system. In hatchery 2 (Jamesway Super J, Magee, MS) 926 normal eggs were processed by the Inovoject system and 910 normal eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 91.04% of the normal eggs, whereas the Intelliject system correctly vaccinated 71.98% of the normal eggs. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that the Inovoject system accurately delivered in ovo vaccine at a significantly higher rate than the Intelliject system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21177463     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

Review 1.  Vaccines against Major Poultry Viral Diseases: Strategies to Improve the Breadth and Protective Efficacy.

Authors:  Rajamanonmani Ravikumar; Janlin Chan; Mookkan Prabakaran
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.818

2.  Evaluation of a thermostable Newcastle disease virus strain TS09-C as an in-ovo vaccine for chickens.

Authors:  Guoyuan Wen; Lintao Li; Qingzhong Yu; Hongling Wang; Qingping Luo; Tengfei Zhang; Rongrong Zhang; Wanpo Zhang; Huabin Shao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics for food producing animals. Part 2: new approaches and potential solutions.

Authors:  Karin Hoelzer; Lisa Bielke; Damer P Blake; Eric Cox; Simon M Cutting; Bert Devriendt; Elisabeth Erlacher-Vindel; Evy Goossens; Kemal Karaca; Stephane Lemiere; Martin Metzner; Margot Raicek; Miquel Collell Suriñach; Nora M Wong; Cyril Gay; Filip Van Immerseel
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Effects of stage of broiler embryo development on coccidiosis vaccine injection accuracy, and subsequent oocyst localization and hatchling quality.

Authors:  A O Sokale; C J Williams; M D Triplett; F J Hoerr; E D Peebles
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Electromagnetic Force-Driven Needle-Free in Ovo Injection Device.

Authors:  Ko-Jung Huang; Cheng-Han Li; Ping-Kun Tsai; Chia-Chun Lai; Yu-Ren Kuo; Ming-Kun Hsieh; Ching-Wei Cheng
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.