Literature DB >> 21177394

Use of MR venography for characterization of the extracranial venous system in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy control subjects.

Robert Zivadinov1, Alexandra Lopez-Soriano, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Claudiu V Schirda, Christopher R Magnano, Kresimir Dolic, Cheryl L Kennedy, Christina L Brooks, Justine A Reuther, Kristin Hunt, Michelle Andrews, Michael G Dwyer, David W Hojnacki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in the extracranial venous system in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy control (HC) subjects by using magnetic resonance (MR) venography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant, prospective study was approved by the local institutional review board, and all participants gave informed consent. Fifty-seven patients, 41 (72%) with relapsing-remitting MS and 16 (28%) with secondary-progressive MS, and 21 HC subjects were imaged with a 3-T MR unit by using two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) and three-dimensional (3D) time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) sequences. In addition, six MS patients and six HC subjects underwent two sequential MR venographic examinations during 1 week to test image-reimage reproducibility. The morphologic features of internal jugular vein flow were classified as absent, pinpoint, flattened, crescentic, or ellipsoidal flow. Only absent and pinpoint flow were considered abnormal. The flow of the vertebral veins was classified as absent or present. The prominence of collateral neck veins and venous asymmetries between the left and right sides were assessed. Differences among groups were tested with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test.
RESULTS: No significant differences in morphologic features of flow in the internal jugular veins and vertebral veins were found between MS patients and HC subjects in any of the examined MR venographic parameters. No differences in asymmetry or prominence were found between MS patients and HC subjects. There was modest agreement (κ = 0.67) between 2D TOF and 3D TRICKS sequences. Image-reimage reproducibility showed modest agreement (κ = 0.66) for 2D TOF and low agreement for 3D TRICKS (κ = 0.33).
CONCLUSION: No significant differences in the extracranial venous systems between MS patients and HC subjects were detected by using MR venography. Standardized guidelines are needed to define parameters for the presence of venous anomalies. © RSNA, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21177394     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  Unclear value of positional MR angiography in evaluating cerebral venous outflow hemodynamics.

Authors:  K Dolic; K Marr; R Zivadinov
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Extracranial venous drainage patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls.

Authors:  R A McTaggart; N J Fischbein; C J Elkins; A Hsiao; M J Cutalo; J Rosenberg; M D Dake; G Zaharchuk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Michael D Dake; Robert Zivadinov; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

4.  Sensitivity and specificity for screening of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency using a multimodal non-invasive imaging approach in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Dolic; K Marr; V Valnarov; M G Dwyer; E Carl; J Hagemeier; C Kennedy; C Brooks; C Kilanowski; K Hunt; D Hojnacki; B Weinstock-Guttman; R Zivadinov
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  CCSVI and MS: a statement from the European Society of neurosonology and cerebral hemodynamics.

Authors:  Claudio Baracchini; José M Valdueza; Massimo Del Sette; Galina Baltgaile; Eva Bartels; Natan M Bornstein; Juergen Klingelhoefer; Carlos Molina; Kurt Niederkorn; Mario Siebler; Matthias Sturzenegger; Bernd E Ringelstein; David Russell; Laszlo Csiba
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  CCSVI and MS: no meaning, no fact.

Authors:  Claudio Baracchini; Matteo Atzori; Paolo Gallo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Comment on: Use of MR Venography for Characterization of the Extracranial Venous System in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Control Subjects : Zivadinov R, Lopez-Soriano A, Weinstock-Guttman B et al. Radiology. 2011;258:562-70.

Authors:  Kira Lutz; Alexander Radbruch; Martin Bendszus
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Hemoglobin as a source of iron overload in multiple sclerosis: does multiple sclerosis share risk factors with vascular disorders?

Authors:  Vladimir V Bamm; George Harauz
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Jugular Venous Flow Abnormalities in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Compared to Normal Controls.

Authors:  Sean K Sethi; David T Utriainen; Ana M Daugherty; Wei Feng; J Joseph Hewett; Naftali Raz; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Lower Arterial Cross-Sectional Area of Carotid and Vertebral Arteries and Higher Frequency of Secondary Neck Vessels Are Associated with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  P Belov; D Jakimovski; J Krawiecki; C Magnano; J Hagemeier; L Pelizzari; B Weinstock-Guttman; R Zivadinov
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.