Literature DB >> 21176955

Polyethylene glycol modified, cross-linked starch-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for enhanced magnetic tumor targeting.

Adam J Cole1, Allan E David, Jianxin Wang, Craig J Galbán, Hannah L Hill, Victor C Yang.   

Abstract

While successful magnetic tumor targeting of iron oxide nanoparticles has been achieved in a number of models, the rapid blood clearance of magnetically suitable particles by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) limits their availability for targeting. This work aimed to develop a long-circulating magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (MNP) platform capable of sustained tumor exposure via the circulation and, thus, potentially enhanced magnetic tumor targeting. Aminated, cross-linked starch (DN) and aminosilane (A) coated MNPs were successfully modified with 5 kDa (A5, D5) or 20 kDa (A20, D20) polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains using simple N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) chemistry and characterized. Identical PEG-weight analogues between platforms (A5 & D5, A20 & D20) were similar in size (140-190 nm) and relative PEG labeling (1.5% of surface amines - A5/D5, 0.4% - A20/D20), with all PEG-MNPs possessing magnetization properties suitable for magnetic targeting. Candidate PEG-MNPs were studied in RES simulations in vitro to predict long-circulating character. D5 and D20 performed best showing sustained size stability in cell culture medium at 37 °C and 7 (D20) to 10 (D5) fold less uptake in RAW264.7 macrophages when compared to previously targeted, unmodified starch MNPs (D). Observations in vitro were validated in vivo, with D5 (7.29 h) and D20 (11.75 h) showing much longer half-lives than D (0.12 h). Improved plasma stability enhanced tumor MNP exposure 100 (D5) to 150 (D20) fold as measured by plasma AUC(0-∞). Sustained tumor exposure over 24 h was visually confirmed in a 9L-glioma rat model (12 mg Fe/kg) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Findings indicate that a polyethylene glycol modified, cross-linked starch-coated MNP is a promising platform for enhanced magnetic tumor targeting, warranting further study in tumor models. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21176955      PMCID: PMC3022959          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  30 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain.

Authors:  Hao-Li Liu; Mu-Yi Hua; Hung-Wei Yang; Chiung-Yin Huang; Po-Chun Chu; Jia-Shin Wu; I-Chou Tseng; Jiun-Jie Wang; Tzu-Chen Yen; Pin-Yuan Chen; Kuo-Chen Wei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  PEG-mediated synthesis of highly dispersive multifunctional superparamagnetic nanoparticles: their physicochemical properties and function in vivo.

Authors:  Conroy Sun; Kim Du; Chen Fang; Narayan Bhattarai; Omid Veiseh; Forrest Kievit; Zachary Stephen; Donghoon Lee; Richard G Ellenbogen; Buddy Ratner; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Contributions of cell kill and posttreatment tumor growth rates to the repopulation of intracerebral 9L tumors after chemotherapy: an MRI study.

Authors:  B D Ross; Y J Zhao; E R Neal; L D Stegman; M Ercolani; O Ben-Yoseph; T L Chenevert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Enzymatic degradation of epichlorohydrin crosslinked starch microspheres by alpha-amylase.

Authors:  G Hamdi; G Ponchel
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Folate-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles for solid tumor targeting as potential specific magnetic hyperthermia mediators: synthesis, physicochemical characterization, and in vitro experiments.

Authors:  Fabio Sonvico; Stéphane Mornet; Sébastien Vasseur; Catherine Dubernet; Danielle Jaillard; Jeril Degrouard; Johan Hoebeke; Etienne Duguet; Paolo Colombo; Patrick Couvreur
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.774

6.  Labeling of immune cells for in vivo imaging using magnetofluorescent nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mikael J Pittet; Filip K Swirski; Frederick Reynolds; Lee Josephson; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  The effect of thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles on rat malignant glioma.

Authors:  Andreas Jordan; Regina Scholz; Klaus Maier-Hauff; Frank K H van Landeghem; Norbert Waldoefner; Ulf Teichgraeber; Jens Pinkernelle; Harald Bruhn; Fabian Neumann; Burghard Thiesen; Andreas von Deimling; Roland Felix
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Size-Dependent Accumulation of PEGylated Silane-Coated Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Murine Tumors.

Authors:  Esben K U Larsen; Thomas Nielsen; Thomas Wittenborn; Henrik Birkedal; Thomas Vorup-Jensen; Mogens H Jakobsen; Leif Ostergaard; Michael R Horsman; Flemming Besenbacher; Kenneth A Howard; Jørgen Kjems
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Determination of polyethylene glycols 4000 and 6000 in plasma protein preparations.

Authors:  B Skoog
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.144

10.  In vivo detection of inflammation using pegylated iron oxide particles targeted at E-selectin: a multimodal approach using MR imaging and EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kim A Radermacher; Nelson Beghein; Sebastien Boutry; Sophie Laurent; Luce Vander Elst; Robert N Muller; Benedicte F Jordan; Bernard Gallez
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  51 in total

1.  Long-circulating heparin-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for potential application as a protein drug delivery platform.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Meong Cheol Shin; Allan E David; Jie Zhou; Kyuri Lee; Huining He; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Potential of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Hung-Wei Yang; Mu-Yi Hua; Hao-Li Liu; Chiung-Yin Huang; Kuo-Chen Wei
Journal:  Nanotechnol Sci Appl       Date:  2012-08-27

3.  Magnetic brain tumor targeting and biodistribution of long-circulating PEG-modified, cross-linked starch-coated iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Adam J Cole; Allan E David; Jianxin Wang; Craig J Galbán; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadali Dadfar; Karolin Roemhild; Natascha I Drude; Saskia von Stillfried; Ruth Knüchel; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Microcarriers with Synthetic Hydrogel Surfaces for Stem Cell Expansion.

Authors:  Andrew D Dias; Jonathan M Elicson; William L Murphy
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 6.  Imaging of cells and nanoparticles: implications for drug delivery to the brain.

Authors:  Katica Stojanov; Inge S Zuhorn; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Erik F J de Vries
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Magnetite Nanoparticles for Medical MR Imaging.

Authors:  Zachary R Stephen; Forrest M Kievit; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 31.041

Review 8.  Cancer theranostics: the rise of targeted magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Adam J Cole; Victor C Yang; Allan E David
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 19.536

9.  In Vivo Evaluation of Site-Specifically PEGylated Chemically Self-Assembled Protein Nanostructures.

Authors:  Rachit Shah; Jacob Petersburg; Amit C Gangar; Adrian Fegan; Carston R Wagner; Sidath C Kumarapperuma
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  In vivo delivery, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hamed Arami; Amit Khandhar; Denny Liggitt; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 54.564

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.