OBJECTIVES: • To evaluate the cytotoxicity of dimeric naphthoquinones (BiQs) in prostate cancer cells. • To assess the interaction of dimeric naphthoquinones with common therapies including radiation and docetaxel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: • The cytotoxicity of 12 different dimeric naphthoquinones was assessed in androgen-independent (PC-3, DU-145) and androgen-responsive (LNCaP, 22RV1) prostate cancer cell lines and in prostate epithelial cells (PrECs). • BiQ2 and BiQ11 were selected for determination of dose response, effects on colony formation and initial exploration into mechanism of action. • Synergistic effects with radiation and docetaxel were explored using colony-forming and MTT assays. RESULTS: • At concentrations of 15µM, BiQ2, BiQ3, BiQ11, BiQ12, and BiQ15 demonstrated cytotoxicity in all prostate cancer cell lines. • Treatment with BiQs limited the ability of prostate cancer cells to form colonies in clonogenic assays. • Exposure of prostate cancer to BiQs increased cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), decreased ATP production, and promoted apoptosis. • BiQ cytotoxicity was independent of NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) activity in PrECs, PC-3 and 22RV1, but not DU-145 cells. • Exposure of prostate cancer cells to radiation before treatment with BiQs increased their activity allowing for inhibitory effects well below the IC(50) s of these compounds in PrECs. • Co-administration of BiQs with docetaxel had minimal additive effects. CONCLUSIONS: • Dimeric naphthoquinones represent a new class of compounds with prostate cancer cytotoxicity and synergistic effects with radiation. The cytotoxic effect of these agents is probably contributed to by the accumulation of ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction. • Further studies are warranted to better characterize this class of potential chemo-therapeutics.
OBJECTIVES: • To evaluate the cytotoxicity of dimeric naphthoquinones (BiQs) in prostate cancer cells. • To assess the interaction of dimeric naphthoquinones with common therapies including radiation and docetaxel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: • The cytotoxicity of 12 different dimeric naphthoquinones was assessed in androgen-independent (PC-3, DU-145) and androgen-responsive (LNCaP, 22RV1) prostate cancer cell lines and in prostate epithelial cells (PrECs). • BiQ2 and BiQ11 were selected for determination of dose response, effects on colony formation and initial exploration into mechanism of action. • Synergistic effects with radiation and docetaxel were explored using colony-forming and MTT assays. RESULTS: • At concentrations of 15µM, BiQ2, BiQ3, BiQ11, BiQ12, and BiQ15 demonstrated cytotoxicity in all prostate cancer cell lines. • Treatment with BiQs limited the ability of prostate cancer cells to form colonies in clonogenic assays. • Exposure of prostate cancer to BiQs increased cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), decreased ATP production, and promoted apoptosis. • BiQcytotoxicity was independent of NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) activity in PrECs, PC-3 and 22RV1, but not DU-145 cells. • Exposure of prostate cancer cells to radiation before treatment with BiQs increased their activity allowing for inhibitory effects well below the IC(50) s of these compounds in PrECs. • Co-administration of BiQs with docetaxel had minimal additive effects. CONCLUSIONS: • Dimeric naphthoquinones represent a new class of compounds with prostate cancercytotoxicity and synergistic effects with radiation. The cytotoxic effect of these agents is probably contributed to by the accumulation of ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction. • Further studies are warranted to better characterize this class of potential chemo-therapeutics.
Authors: Xinhe Wang; Beena Thomas; Rakesh Sachdeva; Linnea Arterburn; Lucy Frye; Patrick G Hatcher; David G Cornwell; Jiyan Ma Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-02-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: John A Cook; David Gius; David A Wink; Murali C Krishna; Angelo Russo; James B Mitchell Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Brandon A Carter-Cooper; Steven Fletcher; Dana Ferraris; Eun Yong Choi; Dahlia Kronfli; Smaraki Dash; Phuc Truong; Edward A Sausville; Rena G Lapidus; Ashkan Emadi Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Veronika Vaverkova; Oldrich Vrana; Vojtech Adam; Tomas Pekarek; Josef Jampilek; Petr Babula Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-06-22 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Matij Pervan; Sandra Marijan; Anita Markotić; Lisa I Pilkington; Natalie A Haverkate; David Barker; Jóhannes Reynisson; Luka Meić; Mila Radan; Vedrana Čikeš Čulić Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Rena G Lapidus; Brandon A Carter-Cooper; Mariola Sadowska; Eun Yong Choi; Omasiri Wonodi; Nidal Muvarak; Karthika Natarajan; Lakshmi S Pidugu; Anil Jaiswal; Eric A Toth; Feyruz V Rassool; Arash Etemadi; Edward A Sausville; Maria R Baer; Ashkan Emadi Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2016-01-19