BACKGROUND: Patients with gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases may undergo operative procedures that yield tissue appropriate to diagnosis of underlying neuromuscular pathology. Critical to accurate diagnosis is the determination of limits of normality based on the study of control human tissues. Although robust diagnostic criteria exist for many qualitative alterations in the neuromuscular apparatus, these do not include quantitative values due to lack of adequate control data. PURPOSE: The aim of this report was to summarize all relevant available published quantitative data for elements of the human enteric nervous system (neuronal cell bodies, glial cells, and nerve fibers) from the perspective of the practicing pathologist. Forty studies meeting inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed with data tabulated in detail and discussed in the context of methodological variations and limitations. The results reveal a lack of concordance between observations of different investigators resulting in data insufficient to produce robust normal ranges. This diversity highlights the need to standardize the way pathologists collect, process, and quantitate neuronal and glial elements in enteric neuropathologic samples, as suggested by recent international guidelines on gastrointestinal neuromuscular pathology.
BACKGROUND:Patients with gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases may undergo operative procedures that yield tissue appropriate to diagnosis of underlying neuromuscular pathology. Critical to accurate diagnosis is the determination of limits of normality based on the study of control human tissues. Although robust diagnostic criteria exist for many qualitative alterations in the neuromuscular apparatus, these do not include quantitative values due to lack of adequate control data. PURPOSE: The aim of this report was to summarize all relevant available published quantitative data for elements of the human enteric nervous system (neuronal cell bodies, glial cells, and nerve fibers) from the perspective of the practicing pathologist. Forty studies meeting inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed with data tabulated in detail and discussed in the context of methodological variations and limitations. The results reveal a lack of concordance between observations of different investigators resulting in data insufficient to produce robust normal ranges. This diversity highlights the need to standardize the way pathologists collect, process, and quantitate neuronal and glial elements in enteric neuropathologic samples, as suggested by recent international guidelines on gastrointestinal neuromuscular pathology.
Authors: Ellen M Schill; Christina M Wright; Alisha Jamil; Jonathan M LaCombe; Randall J Roper; Robert O Heuckeroth Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-04-18
Authors: Elisa Boschetti; Carolina Malagelada; Anna Accarino; Juan R Malagelada; Rosanna F Cogliandro; Alessandra Gori; Elena Bonora; Fiorella Giancola; Francesca Bianco; Vitaliano Tugnoli; Paolo Clavenzani; Fernando Azpiroz; Vincenzo Stanghellini; Catia Sternini; Roberto De Giorgio Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: E Coron; E Auksorius; A Pieretti; M M Mahé; L Liu; C Steiger; Y Bromberg; B Bouma; G Tearney; M Neunlist; A M Goldstein Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2012-10-28 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Kahleb D Graham; Silvia Huerta López; Rajarshi Sengupta; Archana Shenoy; Sabine Schneider; Christina M Wright; Michael Feldman; Emma Furth; Federico Valdivieso; Amanda Lemke; Benjamin J Wilkins; Ali Naji; Edward J Doolin; Marthe J Howard; Robert O Heuckeroth Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 22.682