Literature DB >> 21175883

Delay activity in avian prefrontal cortex--sample code or reward code?

Rebecca Browning1, J Bruce Overmier, Michael Colombo.   

Abstract

In the current study, we examined whether delay activity in the avian equivalent of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) represents a neural correlate of a to-be-remembered sample stimulus or an upcoming reward. Birds were trained on a directed forgetting paradigm in which sample stimuli (red and white) were either followed by a cue to remember (high-frequency tone) or a cue to forget (low-frequency tone). The task also incorporated a differential outcomes procedure in which a correct response on the memory test following a red (remember) sample was rewarded with food, but correct responses on the memory test following the white (remember) sample were not. If delay activity represents a sample code, then it should be seen on both red-remember and white-remember trials. On the other hand, if delay activity represents a reward code, then delay activity should be seen only on red-remember trials, but not white-remember trials. Our findings suggest that activity in the avian PFC represents the outcome associated with each sample (reward or no reward) rather than memory for the sample itself.
© 2010 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2010 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21175883     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07540.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  8 in total

Review 1.  The convergent evolution of neural substrates for cognition.

Authors:  Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  Directed forgetting in rats: Evidence for active memory control?

Authors:  Chiaki Tanaka; Hayato Yahagi; Tohru Taniuchi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Neurons in the crow nidopallium caudolaterale encode varying durations of visual working memory periods.

Authors:  Konstantin Hartmann; Lena Veit; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stimulus-response-outcome coding in the pigeon nidopallium caudolaterale.

Authors:  Sarah Starosta; Onur Güntürkün; Maik C Stüttgen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neurons in the pigeon caudolateral nidopallium differentiate Pavlovian conditioned stimuli but not their associated reward value in a sign-tracking paradigm.

Authors:  Nils Kasties; Sarah Starosta; Onur Güntürkün; Maik C Stüttgen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Representation of time interval entrained by periodic stimuli in the visual thalamus of pigeons.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Qian Wang; Shu-Rong Wang; Yi Wang; Qian Xiao
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The Differential Outcomes Effect in Pigeons (Columba livia): Is It Truly Anticipatory?

Authors:  Marijn Kouwenhoven; Michael Colombo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Crows control working memory before and after stimulus encoding.

Authors:  Erica Fongaro; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.