Literature DB >> 21175826

Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns.

David J Abson1, Mette Termansen.   

Abstract

The economic valuation of ecosystem services is a key policy tool in stemming losses of biological diversity. It is proposed that the loss of ecosystem function and the biological resources within ecosystems is due in part to the failure of markets to recognize the benefits humans derive from ecosystems. Placing monetary values on ecosystem services is often suggested as a necessary step in correcting such market failures. We consider the effects of valuing different types of ecosystem services within an economic framework. We argue that provisioning and regulating ecosystem services are generally produced and consumed in ways that make them amenable to economic valuation. The values associated with cultural ecosystem services lie outside the domain of economic valuation, but their worth may be expressed through noneconomic, deliberative forms of valuation. We argue that supporting ecosystem services are not of direct value and that the losses of such services can be expressed in terms of the effects of their loss on the risk to the provision of the directly valued ecosystem services they support. We propose a heuristic framework that considers the relations between ecological risks and returns in the provision of ecosystem services. The proposed ecosystem-service valuation framework, which allows the expression of the value of all types of ecosystem services, calls for a shift from static, purely monetary valuation toward the consideration of trade-offs between the current flow of benefits from ecosystems and the ability of those ecosystems to provide future flows. ©2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21175826     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01623.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

Review 1.  Navigating cognition biases in the search of sustainability.

Authors:  John-Oliver Engler; David J Abson; Henrik von Wehrden
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research: A review and three recommendations.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Rau; Verena Burkhardt; Christian Dorninger; Cecilia Hjort; Karin Ibe; Lisa Keßler; Jeppe A Kristensen; Andrew McRobert; William Sidemo-Holm; Heike Zimmermann; David J Abson; Henrik von Wehrden; Johan Ekroos
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply-Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services-A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed.

Authors:  Hongjuan Zhang; Juan Feng; Zhicheng Zhang; Kang Liu; Xin Gao; Zidong Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Avoiding a bad apple: Insect pollination enhances fruit quality and economic value.

Authors:  M P D Garratt; T D Breeze; N Jenner; C Polce; J C Biesmeijer; S G Potts
Journal:  Agric Ecosyst Environ       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.567

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.