Literature DB >> 21175555

Prediction-based structured variable selection through the receiver operating characteristic curves.

Yuanjia Wang1, Huaihou Chen, Runze Li, Naihua Duan, Roberto Lewis-Fernández.   

Abstract

In many clinical settings, a commonly encountered problem is to assess accuracy of a screening test for early detection of a disease. In these applications, predictive performance of the test is of interest. Variable selection may be useful in designing a medical test. An example is a research study conducted to design a new screening test by selecting variables from an existing screener with a hierarchical structure among variables: there are several root questions followed by their stem questions. The stem questions will only be asked after a subject has answered the root question. It is therefore unreasonable to select a model that only contains stem variables but not its root variable. In this work, we propose methods to perform variable selection with structured variables when predictive accuracy of a diagnostic test is the main concern of the analysis. We take a linear combination of individual variables to form a combined test. We then maximize a direct summary measure of the predictive performance of the test, the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC of an ROC), subject to a penalty function to control for overfitting. Since maximizing empirical AUC of the ROC of a combined test is a complicated nonconvex problem (Pepe, Cai, and Longton, 2006, Biometrics62, 221-229), we explore the connection between the empirical AUC and a support vector machine (SVM). We cast the problem of maximizing predictive performance of a combined test as a penalized SVM problem and apply a reparametrization to impose the hierarchical structure among variables. We also describe a penalized logistic regression variable selection procedure for structured variables and compare it with the ROC-based approaches. We use simulation studies based on real data to examine performance of the proposed methods. Finally we apply developed methods to design a structured screener to be used in primary care clinics to refer potentially psychotic patients for further specialty diagnostics and treatment.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21175555      PMCID: PMC3134557          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01533.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.

Authors:  Patrick J Heagerty; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Evaluating technologies for classification and prediction in medicine.

Authors:  M S Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Combining multiple markers for classification using ROC.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The Skill Plot: a graphical technique for evaluating continuous diagnostic tests.

Authors:  William M Briggs; Russell Zaretzki
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Gene selection using support vector machines with non-convex penalty.

Authors:  Hao Helen Zhang; Jeongyoun Ahn; Xiaodong Lin; Cheolwoo Park
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  One-step Sparse Estimates in Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood Models.

Authors:  Hui Zou; Runze Li
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.028

10.  Psychotic symptoms in an urban general medicine practice.

Authors:  Mark Olfson; Roberto Lewis-Fernández; Myrna M Weissman; Adriana Feder; Marc J Gameroff; Daniel Pilowsky; Milton Fuentes
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  6 in total

1.  Combining biomarkers linearly and nonlinearly for classification using the area under the ROC curve.

Authors:  Youyi Fong; Shuxin Yin; Ying Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Structured variable selection with q-values.

Authors:  Tanya P Garcia; Samuel Müller; Raymond J Carroll; Tamara N Dunn; Anthony P Thomas; Sean H Adams; Suresh D Pillai; Rosemary L Walzem
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  A miRNA-Based Signature Detected in Primary Melanoma Tissue Predicts Development of Brain Metastasis.

Authors:  Doug Hanniford; Judy Zhong; Lisa Koetz; Avital Gaziel-Sovran; Daniel J Lackaye; Shulian Shang; Anna Pavlick; Richard Shapiro; Russell Berman; Farbod Darvishian; Yongzhao Shao; Iman Osman; Eva Hernando
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Estimating personalized diagnostic rules depending on individualized characteristics.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Yuanjia Wang; Chaorui Huang; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Auxiliary marker-assisted classification in the absence of class identifiers.

Authors:  Yuanjia Wang; Huaihou Chen; Donglin Zeng; Christine Mauro; Naihua Duan; M Katherine Shear
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Serum microRNAs as biomarkers for recurrence in melanoma.

Authors:  Erica B Friedman; Shulian Shang; Eleazar Vega-Saenz de Miera; Jacob Ulrik Fog; Maria Wrang Teilum; Michelle W Ma; Russell S Berman; Richard L Shapiro; Anna C Pavlick; Eva Hernando; Adam Baker; Yongzhao Shao; Iman Osman
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.