Literature DB >> 21175506

The role of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine in the development of guidelines and performance measures.

Jesse M Pines1, Christopher Fee, Gregory J Fermann, Anthony A Ferroggiaro, Charlene B Irvin, Maryann Mazer, W Frank Peacock, Jeremiah D Schuur, Ellen J Weber, Charles V Pollack.   

Abstract

Measurement of adherence to clinical standards has become increasingly important to the practice of emergency medicine (EM). In recent years, along with a proliferation of evidence-based practice guidelines and performance measures, there has been a movement to incorporate measurement into reimbursement strategies, many of which affect EM practice. On behalf of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Guidelines Committee 2009-2010, the purposes of this document are to: 1) differentiate the processes of guideline and performance measure development, 2) describe how performance measures are currently and will be used in pay-for-performance initiatives, and 3) discuss opportunities for SAEM to affect future guideline and performance measurement development for emergency care. Specific recommendations include that SAEM should: 1) develop programs to sponsor guideline and quality measurement research; 2) increase participation in the process of guideline and quality measure development, endorsement, and maintenance; 3) increase collaboration with other EM organizations to review performance measures proposed by organizations outside of EM that affect emergency medical care; and 4) answer calls for participation in the selection and implementation of performance measures through The Joint Commission and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
© 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21175506     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00914.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  3 in total

1.  Adherence to guidelines and protocols in the prehospital and emergency care setting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Remco H A Ebben; Lilian C M Vloet; Michael H J Verhofstad; Sanne Meijer; Joke A J Mintjes-de Groot; Theo van Achterberg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Evaluation of emergency department performance - a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures.

Authors:  Christian Michel Sørup; Peter Jacobsen; Jakob Lundager Forberg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Development and validation of a scoring system for mortality prediction and application of standardized W statistics to assess the performance of emergency departments.

Authors:  Jinwoo Jeong; Sung Woo Lee; Won Young Kim; Kap Su Han; Su Jin Kim; Hyungoo Kang
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-06-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.