Literature DB >> 21174227

Control of neural synchrony using channelrhodopsin-2: a computational study.

Sachin S Talathi1, Paul R Carney, Pramod P Khargonekar.   

Abstract

In this paper, we present an optical stimulation based approach to induce 1:1 in-phase synchrony in a network of coupled interneurons wherein each interneuron expresses the light sensitive protein channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2). We begin with a transition rate model for the channel kinetics of ChR2 in response to light stimulation. We then define "functional optical time response curve (fOTRC)" as a measure of the response of a periodically firing interneuron (transfected with ChR2 ion channel) to a periodic light pulse stimulation. We specifically consider the case of unidirectionally coupled (UCI) network and propose an open loop control architecture that uses light as an actuation signal to induce 1:1 in-phase synchrony in the UCI network. Using general properties of the spike time response curves (STRCs) for Type-1 neuron model (Ermentrout, Neural Comput 8:979-1001, 1996) and fOTRC, we estimate the (open loop) optimal actuation signal parameters required to induce 1:1 in-phase synchrony. We then propose a closed loop controller architecture and a controller algorithm to robustly sustain stable 1:1 in-phase synchrony in the presence of unknown deviations in the network parameters. Finally, we test the performance of this closed-loop controller in a network of mutually coupled (MCI) interneurons.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21174227     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-010-0296-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  40 in total

Review 1.  The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration.

Authors:  F Varela; J P Lachaux; E Rodriguez; J Martinerie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  A network of electrically coupled interneurons drives synchronized inhibition in neocortex.

Authors:  M Beierlein; J R Gibson; B W Connors
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Using heterogeneity to predict inhibitory network model characteristics.

Authors:  F K Skinner; J Y J Chung; I Ncube; P A Murray; S A Campbell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Synchronization induced by temporal delays in pulse-coupled oscillators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 5.  Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Spike timing dependent plasticity promotes synchrony of inhibitory networks in the presence of heterogeneity.

Authors:  Sachin S Talathi; Dong-Uk Hwang; William L Ditto
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 7.  Neural synchrony and the development of cortical networks.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Frédéric Roux; Eugenio Rodriguez; Anna Rotarska-Jagiela; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model.

Authors:  X J Wang; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A mechanism for generation of long-range synchronous fast oscillations in the cortex.

Authors:  R D Traub; M A Whittington; I M Stanford; J G Jefferys
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Spike transmission and synchrony detection in networks of GABAergic interneurons.

Authors:  M Galarreta; S Hestrin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optogenetic versus Electrical Stimulation of Human Cardiomyocytes: Modeling Insights.

Authors:  John C Williams; Emilia Entcheva
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Adjacent channelrhodopsin-2 residues within transmembranes 2 and 7 regulate cation selectivity and distribution of the two open states.

Authors:  Ryan Richards; Robert E Dempski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Cardiac optogenetics.

Authors:  Emilia Entcheva
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Phase response theory extended to nonoscillatory network components.

Authors:  Fred H Sieling; Santiago Archila; Ryan Hooper; Carmen C Canavier; Astrid A Prinz
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-05-14

5.  Controlling the oscillation phase through precisely timed closed-loop optogenetic stimulation: a computational study.

Authors:  Annette Witt; Agostina Palmigiano; Andreas Neef; Ahmed El Hady; Fred Wolf; Demian Battaglia
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Computational optogenetics: empirically-derived voltage- and light-sensitive channelrhodopsin-2 model.

Authors:  John C Williams; Jianjin Xu; Zhongju Lu; Aleksandra Klimas; Xuxin Chen; Christina M Ambrosi; Ira S Cohen; Emilia Entcheva
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  A comprehensive multiscale framework for simulating optogenetics in the heart.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; John C Williams; Christina M Ambrosi; Emilia Entcheva; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.