BACKGROUND: Current treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have provided improved overall survival, but complete responses are rare. We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the objective response rate of 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2 NCD) alone and in combination with sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on sunitinib alone. METHODS: Adults with metastatic kidney cancer were stratified depending on whether they were still taking sunitinib or had discontinued sunitinib therapy at the time of registration. Patients were treated with 2ME2 NCD alone or in combination with sunitinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. RESULTS: In total, 17 patients were enrolled, and 12 were evaluable for response (arm A, n = 7; arm b, n = 5). In arm A, four patients had the best response of stable disease, and three patients developed disease progression. In arm B, three patients had a best response of stable disease, and two patients had disease progression. One patient continued to receive treatment for a total of 14 cycles before developing disease progression. Fatigue was the most common observed toxicities. Thirty five percent of patients required discontinuation of therapy secondary to toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: 2ME2 NCD had minimal anti-tumor activity, with no observed objective responses. The study was terminated because 2ME2 NCD was not found to be tolerable at the recommended phase 2 dose in this patient population. A newer 2ME2 analog is in development with a more favorable toxicity profile and increased potency.
BACKGROUND: Current treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have provided improved overall survival, but complete responses are rare. We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the objective response rate of 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2 NCD) alone and in combination with sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on sunitinib alone. METHODS: Adults with metastatic kidney cancer were stratified depending on whether they were still taking sunitinib or had discontinued sunitinib therapy at the time of registration. Patients were treated with 2ME2 NCD alone or in combination with sunitinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. RESULTS: In total, 17 patients were enrolled, and 12 were evaluable for response (arm A, n = 7; arm b, n = 5). In arm A, four patients had the best response of stable disease, and three patients developed disease progression. In arm B, three patients had a best response of stable disease, and two patients had disease progression. One patient continued to receive treatment for a total of 14 cycles before developing disease progression. Fatigue was the most common observed toxicities. Thirty five percent of patients required discontinuation of therapy secondary to toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: 2ME2 NCD had minimal anti-tumor activity, with no observed objective responses. The study was terminated because 2ME2 NCD was not found to be tolerable at the recommended phase 2 dose in this patient population. A newer 2ME2 analog is in development with a more favorable toxicity profile and increased potency.
Authors: T L Yue; X Wang; C S Louden; S Gupta; K Pillarisetti; J L Gu; T K Hart; P G Lysko; G Z Feuerstein Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: S Pyrhönen; E Salminen; M Ruutu; T Lehtonen; M Nurmi; T Tammela; H Juusela; E Rintala; P Hietanen; P L Kellokumpu-Lehtinen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Qing Zhou; Daniel Gustafson; Sujatha Nallapareddy; Sami Diab; Stephen Leong; Karl Lewis; Lia Gore; Wells A Messersmith; Anthony M Treston; S Gail Eckhardt; Carolyn Sidor; D Ross Camidge Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Nicola J Mabjeesh; Daniel Escuin; Theresa M LaVallee; Victor S Pribluda; Glenn M Swartz; Michelle S Johnson; Margaret T Willard; Hua Zhong; Jonathan W Simons; Paraskevi Giannakakou Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Theresa M LaVallee; Xiaoguo H Zhan; Michelle S Johnson; Chris J Herbstritt; Glenn Swartz; Mark S Williams; Wendy A Hembrough; Shawn J Green; Victor S Pribluda Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ravi Kumar Vyas Devambatla; Wei Li; Nilesh Zaware; Shruti Choudhary; Ernest Hamel; Susan L Mooberry; Aleem Gangjee Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Tony Fröhlich; Anita Kiss; János Wölfling; Erzsébet Mernyák; Ágnes E Kulmány; Renáta Minorics; István Zupkó; Maria Leidenberger; Oliver Friedrich; Barbara Kappes; Friedrich Hahn; Manfred Marschall; Gyula Schneider; Svetlana B Tsogoeva Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Carrie R Muh; Shweta Joshi; Alok R Singh; Santosh Kesari; Donald L Durden; Milan T Makale Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Benjamin Carlisle; Nadine Demko; Georgina Freeman; Amanda Hakala; Nathalie MacKinnon; Tim Ramsay; Spencer Hey; Alex John London; Jonathan Kimmelman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 13.506