Literature DB >> 21173930

Skin Detachment and Regrowth in Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

Laurence Feldmeyer1, Thomas Harr, Antonio Cozzio, Lars E French, Alexander A Navarini.   

Abstract

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a rare but clinically well-described dermatological pathology. However, clinical pictures of this disorder in text books do not reflect its dynamic evolution. Usually, the desquamative post-bullous stage is represented, neglecting the initial bullous stage as well as the skin healing. With one clinical case, we provide a day-after-day illustration of the evolution of a patient suffering from toxic epidermal necrolysis. During one month, a skin area of a limb was regularly photo-documented.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21173930      PMCID: PMC3004215          DOI: 10.1159/000313866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Dermatol        ISSN: 1662-6567


Case Report

A 15-year-old female developed fever, stinging eyes and headache, followed one day later by sudden appearance of flaccid blisters on the face with subsequent dissemination to more than 70% of the whole integument and development of mucosal erosions. Thirty days before, she had been operated on the nose and medicated with cefuroxime (for 8 days), paracetamol (for approx. 10 days) and metamizol (for approx. 10 days), the latter of which was later identified by lymphocyte transformation test as the most likely causative compound. Four days before admission, she had taken acetylsalicylic acid and paracetamol for flu-like symptoms including conjunctival irritation and rhinitis. Upon physical evaluation, disseminated flaccid blisters filled with serous liquid were present on 70% of her skin surface. Her eye-, mouth-, pharyngeal- and genital mucosae were also affected by erosive lesions. A skin biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [1]. The calculated SCORTEN was 1. She received intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) [2,3,4], in total 3 g/kg body weight over three consecutive days, hydration and nutritional support as well as careful wound care. Topical therapy included silver-coated dressings on erosions, and after reepithelialization, skin washes with water and wax emulsion were performed, followed by the application of hydrocortisone 0.5% in hydrophilic unguent. From day 1 after onset of IVIG therapy onwards, no new development of blisters was observed. During the clinical course, desquamation of dusky areas of skin leaving an intact epidermis below was observed. We noted frequent spontaneous bleeding upon changes of the silver-coated dressings during reepithelialization period in the second week. The remaining detached skin fragments that overlied the progressively regrowing epidermis as of day 7 were progressively shed between day 7 and day 28. The patient was discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) at day 28 after admission, with almost complete skin reepithelialization. At the last follow-up control 6 months later, the patient showed full recovery, except for residual alopecia and dry eyes. Multiple areas of hypopigmentation confined to areas of previous epidermal detachment were also observed.

Current Therapeutic Modalities for TEN

To date, no specific treatment with a high evidence level of efficacy has been reported for TEN. The standard of care consists of best supportive therapy in an ICU setting, and includes hydroelectrolytic and nutritional support as well as regular wound care and the appropriate detection and treatment of infectious complications. Whereas best supportive care is an accepted standard of care for TEN patients, none of the specific treatment strategies described to date, including IVIG (adequately dosed at 3 g/kg body weight; there is an apparent dose dependence, as the reduction in mortality appears to be greatest for doses of 3-4 g/kg [4]), corticosteroids, and infliximab, has shown solid evidence in support of a survival advantage in TEN patients [5]. To date, only one prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial has been reported in TEN, demonstrating no therapeutic benefit for thalidomide in the treatment of TEN [6]. IVIG is a safe therapeutic modality that has been shown in several case series to potentially provide a benefit in TEN. Controversy as to the exact efficacy does, however, exist [7]. In the recently established guideline for the use of high-dose immunoglobulins in dermatology, early administration of high-dose immunoglobulins (3 g/kg) is recommended in the lack of therapeutic alternatives [8]. Indeed, several published studies reporting the use of IVIG for the treatment of TEN have shown this therapy to potentially provide a survival benefit. The studies published to date are unfortunately heterogeneous, and often of limited size, retrospective nature, and noncontrolled. On the other hand, TEN is a rare disease, and randomized prospective controlled studies analyzing the effect of IVIG are very difficult to perform, and do not exist to date. Eight of the 11 studies published to date reporting the use of IVIG in TEN suggest a positive effect of IVIG on mortality if compared to the mortality predicted by SCORTEN where applied, or the 25-35% average mortality rate for TEN reported in the literature (table 1). It must be kept in mind, however, that as for many other therapies, the total dose (in g/kg body weight) of IVIG administered may have an effect on the therapeutic outcome. Indeed, a recent publication by Trent et al., analyzing in detail the studies published to date, showed that a dose-response relationship likely exists: per 1-g/kg increase in IVIG dose, there was an observed 4.2-fold increase in patient survival. Moreover, no mortality was observed amongst the 30 patients that had received 3 g/kg IVIG or more [7]. Taking into account the lack of a proven specific therapy, the severity of TEN, the safety of IVIG, and the data to date concerning the efficacy of IVIG in TEN, we are of the opinion that in the absence of proven superior therapies, IVIG therapy should be considered in patients with TEN.
Table 1

Overview of the published studies on IVIG use including 10 or more patients

Viard 1998 [2]Trent 2003 [9]Prins 2003 [3]Campione 2003 [10]Al-Mutairi 2004 [11]Shortt 2004 [12]Tan 2005 [13]Stella 2007 [14]Bachot 2003 [15]Brown 2004 [16]Schneck 2008 [17]
StudyPNCRNCRNCPNCPNCRNCRNCRCPNCRNCRC

Patients1024481012161223342475

Detach, %394445495865×××1949×

Dose IVIG, g/kg34322×52.82×21.61.9 (0.7×2.3)

Predicted mortality, %×33 (S)×35 (S)×38 (A)×35.8 (S)24 (S)28.6 (S)25 (S)

Actual mortality, %0412100258263241.734

PNC = Prospective, noncontrolled; RNC = retrospective, noncontrolled; RC = retrospective, controlled; S = SCORTEN; A = APACHE.

Initial rash involving 65 ± 29% TBSA.

  16 in total

1.  Effects of treatments on the mortality of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: A retrospective study on patients included in the prospective EuroSCAR Study.

Authors:  Jürgen Schneck; Jean-Paul Fagot; Peggy Sekula; Bruno Sassolas; Jean Claude Roujeau; Maja Mockenhaupt
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS): experience with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins and topical conservative approach. A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Maurizio Stella; Alessandra Clemente; Daniele Bollero; Daniela Risso; Paola Dalmasso
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Guidelines on the use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatology.

Authors:  Alexander Enk
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.328

Review 4.  Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome: our current understanding.

Authors:  Lars E French; Jennifer T Trent; Francisco A Kerdel
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 4.932

Review 5.  Prospective, noncomparative open study from Kuwait of the role of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Authors:  N Al-Mutairi; Joshi Arun; Nour-Eldin Osama; Zaki Amr; Al-Sheltawy Mazen; El-Adawy Ibtesam; El-Baghly Nazeha
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.736

6.  Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a prospective noncomparative study showing no benefit on mortality or progression.

Authors:  Nicolas Bachot; Jean Revuz; Jean-Claude Roujeau
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2003-01

7.  Randomised comparison of thalidomide versus placebo in toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Authors:  P Wolkenstein; J Latarjet; J C Roujeau; C Duguet; S Boudeau; L Vaillant; M Maignan; M H Schuhmacher; B Milpied; A Pilorget; H Bocquet; C Brun-Buisson; J Revuz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Toxic epidermal necrolysis: does immunoglobulin make a difference?

Authors:  K M Brown; G M Silver; M Halerz; P Walaszek; A Sandroni; Richard L Gamelli
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

9.  Inhibition of toxic epidermal necrolysis by blockade of CD95 with human intravenous immunoglobulin.

Authors:  I Viard; P Wehrli; R Bullani; P Schneider; N Holler; D Salomon; T Hunziker; J H Saurat; J Tschopp; L E French
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Treatment strategies in toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome: where are we at?

Authors:  Gerard J Abood; Brian J Nickoloff; Richard L Gamelli
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.