Literature DB >> 21173612

Clinical outcomes of nitinol staples for preventing curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis.

William F Lavelle1, Amer F Samdani, Patrick J Cahill, Randal R Betz.   

Abstract

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although bracing for idiopathic scoliosis is moderately successful, its efficacy has been called into question and it carries associated psychosocial ramifications. In this study we report the background, rationale, indications, surgical techniques, and early results of vertebral body stapling (VBS) in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: We reviewed the literature on growth modulation of the growing spine and the concepts behind the use of VBS as a fusionless strategy. The indications are derived from retrospectively reviewed patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with VBS followed for a minimum of 2 years. Indications for staple use included: (a) age <13 years in girls and 15 in boys, (b) Risser 0 or 1 and/or 1 year of growth remaining on wrist radiograph, (c) coronal curve <45 degrees with minimal rotation and flexible to <25 degrees on a side bending radiograph, and (d) sagittal thoracic curve <40 degrees.
RESULTS: Thoracic curves measuring <35 degrees had a success rate of 77.7%. Curves which reached ≤ 20 degrees on first erect radiograph had a success rate of 85.7%. Thoracic curves greater than 35 degrees were not successful and require alternative treatments. Lumbar curves demonstrated a success rate of 86.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with idiopathic scoliosis with moderate curves (25 to 45 degrees) and high risk of progression can be safely treated with VBS as an alternative to bracing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21173612     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181ff9a4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  7 in total

1.  The impact of a corrective tether on a scoliosis porcine model: a detailed 3D analysis with a 20 weeks follow-up.

Authors:  Bertrand Moal; Frank Schwab; Jason Demakakos; Renaud Lafage; Paul Riviere; Ashish Patel; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Spinal growth tethering: indications and limits.

Authors:  Peter O Newton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

3.  Biomechanical comparison of continuous compression implants versus tension band fixation for transverse olecranon fractures.

Authors:  Morgan Moon; Kyle Schweser; Will Bezold; James L Cook
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-28

4.  [Non-fusion techniques for treatment of pediatric scoliosis].

Authors:  K Ridderbusch; M Rupprecht; P Kunkel; R Stücker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  The modulation of spinal growth with nitinol intervertebral stapling in an established swine model.

Authors:  Joseph H Carreau; Christine L Farnsworth; Diana A Glaser; Joshua D Doan; Tracey Bastrom; Nathan Bryan; Peter O Newton
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Thoracic proportions in children without scoliosis.

Authors:  J Kennedy; T Hoffman; H Unasa; C Frampton; A Howard; P J Kiely; H Crawford
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Nitinol Memory Rods Versus Titanium Rods: A Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Spinal Instrumentation in a Synthetic Corpectomy Model.

Authors:  Patrick A Massey; Stephen Hoge; Bradley G Nelson; Alan L Ogden; Milan G Mody; Mitchell Myers; Karl Bilderback; Giovanni Solitro; Richard S Barton
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.