Literature DB >> 21173437

Self-report measure of psychological abuse of older adults.

Kendon J Conrad1, Madelyn Iris, John W Ridings, Kate Langley, Georgia J Anetzberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study tested key psychometric properties of the Older Adult Psychological Abuse Measure (OAPAM), one self-report scale of the Older Adult Mistreatment Assessment (OAMA). DESIGN AND METHODS: Items and theory were developed in a prior concept mapping study. Subsequently, the measures were administered to 226 substantiated clients by 22 elder abuse staff from 7 agencies in a full-scale field test. The resulting database was used to estimate the psychometric properties of the OAPAM using the Rasch item response theory model and traditional validation techniques. Analyses included tests for dimensionality, model fit, and theoretical construct validation. Results from the OAPAM client report were validated against the adult protective services substantiation decision of abuse and the elder abuse staff assessment of psychological abuse (PA).
RESULTS: The client self-report measures met stringent Rasch analysis fit and unidimensionality criteria and had high person (internal consistency) and item reliability. The validity results supported the usefulness of the client measures and led to reconsideration of aspects of the hypothesized theoretical hierarchy. A short form was developed. Cut-points were proposed to distinguish levels of PA. IMPLICATIONS: The measure is now available to aid in the assessment of PA of older adults by both clinicians and researchers. Theoretical refinements developed using the Rasch item hierarchy may help to improve assessment and intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21173437     DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnq103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  6 in total

1.  Elder Abuse Severity: A Critical but Understudied Dimension of Victimization for Clinicians and Researchers.

Authors:  David Burnes; Karl Pillemer; Mark S Lachs
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Development of short-form measures to assess four types of elder mistreatment: Findings from an evidence-based study of APS elder abuse substantiation decisions.

Authors:  Scott R Beach; Pi-Ju Liu; Marguerite DeLiema; Madelyn Iris; Melissa J K Howe; Kendon J Conrad
Journal:  J Elder Abuse Negl       Date:  2017-06-07

3.  Examining Adult Protective Services Outcomes: Services Associated With the Decrease of Mistreatment Differed by Elder Mistreatment Type.

Authors:  Pi-Ju Liu; Zachary Hass; Sara K Stratton; Karen M Conrad; Kendon J Conrad
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-10-19

4.  Indicators to facilitate the early identification of patients with major depressive disorder in need of highly specialized care: A concept mapping study.

Authors:  F C W van Krugten; M Goorden; A J L M van Balkom; J Spijker; W B F Brouwer; L Hakkaart-van Roijen
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 6.505

5.  Elder Abuse Assessment Tools and Interventions for use in the Home Environment: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kathleen Van Royen; Paul Van Royen; Liesbeth De Donder; Robbert J Gobbens
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Development and usability evaluation of VOICES: A digital health tool to identify elder mistreatment.

Authors:  Fuad Abujarad; Davis Ulrich; Chelsea Edwards; Esther Choo; Michael V Pantalon; Karen Jubanyik; James Dziura; Gail D'Onofrio; Thomas M Gill
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 7.538

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.