Literature DB >> 2117343

Liver tumor imaging: current concepts.

J T Ferrucci1.   

Abstract

With the increasing availability of curative surgical techniques for primary and secondary hepatic neoplasms, the tasks for clinical imaging of patients suspected of having liver cancer have become more exacting. Detection of tumor, differential diagnosis of individual nodules, and mapping the anatomic extensions of malignant disease are now required routinely. Related and unrelated liver substrate abnormalities such as cavernous hemangioma and focal fatty deposits are often discovered in these patients and must be differentiated from metastatic deposits. Moreover, modern imaging methods frequently display tiny nodules (less than 1 cm) that often prove difficult to adequately characterize (micrometastases vs other kinds of lesions). The most sensitive imaging techniques are CT after arterial portography and intraoperative sonography, but because of their invasiveness, these are reserved exclusively for cancer staging. For primary screening, MR imaging is increasingly preferred over CT because of its superiority in discriminating hemangiomas and cysts from metastases without the need for iodinated contrast material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2117343     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.3.2117343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Peritoneal ovarian metastases simulating liver parenchymal metastases.

Authors:  C Lundstedt; T Holmin; B Thorvinger
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

2.  Transcutaneous abdominal ultrasonography in the staging of lung cancer.

Authors:  P S Bakke; M Taule; E Lillo; G Melgren; I J Magnussen; O J Halvorsen
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Enucleation is Better for a Giant Hemangioma Proximal to the Hepatic Portal Vascular Structures.

Authors:  Chuan-Xing Wu; Wan-Yuan Bao; Feng Zhu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Detection of hepatic VX2 tumors in rabbits: comparison of conventional US and phase-inversion harmonic US during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Jeong Min Lee; Ji Hyun Youk; Young Hwan Lee; Young Kon Kim; Chong Soo Kim; Chun Ai Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Limitations and pitfalls of Couinaud's segmentation of the liver in transaxial Imaging.

Authors:  H Strunk; G Stuckmann; J Textor; W Willinek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Using an artificial neural network to diagnose hepatic masses.

Authors:  P S Maclin; J Dempsey
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Preoperative evaluation of patients for liver resection. Appropriate CT imaging.

Authors:  R C Karl; S S Morse; R D Halpert; R A Clark
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Hepatic angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  V H Low; W H Breidahl; P D Robbins
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec

9.  A new and simple practical plane dividing hepatic segment 2 and 3 of the liver: evaluation of its validity.

Authors:  Ho Yun Lee; Jin Wook Chung; Jeong Min Lee; Chang Jin Yoon; Whal Lee; Hwan Jun Jae; Yong Hu Yin; Sung-Gwon Kang; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Staging of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  P Mohr; A M M Eggermont; A Hauschild; A Buzaid
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.