Literature DB >> 21173414

Meta-analysis: statin therapy does not alter the association between low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increased cardiovascular risk.

Haseeb Jafri1, Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali, Richard H Karas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction (MI). Although statins reduce the risk for MI, most cardiovascular events still occur despite statin treatment.
PURPOSE: Using meta-analysis of large randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of statins to determine whether statins alter the relationship between HDL-C level and MI. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search to February 2010, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists from eligible studies. STUDY SELECTION: English-language RCTs of statin-treated patients versus control participants with 1000 or more person-years of follow-up and reported HDL-C levels and MI. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent investigators extracted data from eligible RCTs. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty eligible RCTs were identified (543,210 person-years of follow-up and 7838 MIs). After adjustment for on-treatment LDL-C levels, age, hypertension, diabetes, and tobacco use, there was a significant inverse association between HDL-C levels and risk for MI in statin-treated patients and control participants. In Poisson meta-regressions, every 0.26-mmol/L (10-mg/dL) decrease in HDL-C was associated with 7.1 (95% CI, 6.8 to 7.3) and 8.3 (CI, 8.1 to 8.5) more MIs per 1000 person-years in statin-treated patients and control participants, respectively. The inverse association between HDL-C levels and MI did not differ between statin-treated patients and control participants (P= 0.57). LIMITATION: The observed associations may be explained by unmeasured confounding and do not imply causality in the relationship between HDL-C level and cardiovascular risk.
CONCLUSION: Statins do not alter the relationship between HDL-C level and cardiovascular risk, such that low levels of HDL-C remain significantly and independently associated with increased risk despite statin treatment. The remaining risk seen in statin-treated patients may be partly explained by low HDL-C levels or other factors associated with low levels of HDL-C. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21173414     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-12-201012210-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  33 in total

1.  What intervention trials don't tell us: the residual risk in primary prevention.

Authors:  Claudio Cimminiello
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Melvyn Rubenfire; Robert D Brook
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Treating low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Mirella P Hage; Sami T Azar
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 4.  HDL: to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  Angela Pirillo; Gianpaolo Tibolla; Giuseppe Danilo Norata; Alberico Luigi Catapano
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Stabilization of high-risk plaques.

Authors:  Kohei Takata; Satoshi Imaizumi; Bo Zhang; Shin-Ichiro Miura; Keijiro Saku
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-08

6.  Predictive and protective role of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jin Sup Park; Kwang Soo Cha; Hye Won Lee; Jun-Hyok Oh; Jung Hyun Choi; Han Cheol Lee; Taek Jong Hong; Myung Ho Jeong; Shung Chull Chae; Young Jo Kim
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 7.  HDL hypothesis: where do we stand now?

Authors:  Sayed M Tariq; Mandeep S Sidhu; Peter P Toth; William E Boden
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  Niacin: the evidence, clinical use, and future directions.

Authors:  Todd C Villines; Andrew S Kim; Rosco S Gore; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 9.  Residual cardiovascular risk despite optimal LDL cholesterol reduction with statins: the evidence, etiology, and therapeutic challenges.

Authors:  Uchechukwu K Sampson; Sergio Fazio; MacRae F Linton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 10.  Update in therapeutic approaches to plaque stabilization.

Authors:  Stephen J Nicholls; Yu Kataoka
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.