Literature DB >> 21173041

Flapping loops: roles for hinges in a ligand-binding domain of the nicotinic receptor.

Joe Henry Steinbach1.   

Abstract

One of the goals of molecular pharmacology is to understand the machinery that converts information about the presence of a chemical (binding) to a functional consequence. Agonists are drugs that bind to their molecular targets and cause conformational changes underlying activation of the target. Inevitably, therefore, it can be difficult to disentangle the affinity of the agonist for the target from its efficacy in producing the ensuing conformational change. Efficacy depends on two factors: the intrinsic equilibrium between active and inactive states in the absence of agonist, and the energy contributed by the agonist as a result of the relative affinities of agonist for the active and inactive states. These difficulties are particularly frustrating when the goal is to determine the role(s) that particular residues in a target protein have in shaping the overall efficacy of a drug: how is it possible to unambiguously distinguish a role in determining intrinsic efficacy from one in determining relative affinity? This perspective highlights a research article in this issue (p. 351) that demonstrates a quantitative approach to the resolution of this problem in the case of activation of the muscle nicotinic receptor. This elegant (if demanding) approach involves determining, separately, the consequences of specific mutations on gating in the unliganded and liganded states.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21173041      PMCID: PMC3061362          DOI: 10.1124/mol.110.070102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  18 in total

1.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL.

Authors:  J MONOD; J WYMAN; J P CHANGEUX
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Interaction at end-plate receptors between different choline derivatives.

Authors:  J DEL CASTILLO; B KATZ
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1957-05-07

3.  The mode of action of nicotine and curari, determined by the form of the contraction curve and the method of temperature coefficients.

Authors:  A V Hill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1909-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  The gating isomerization of neuromuscular acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  On the excitability and cooperativity of the electroplax membrane.

Authors:  J P Changeux; T R Podleski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Glycine hinges with opposing actions at the acetylcholine receptor-channel transmitter binding site.

Authors:  Prasad Purohit; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Energetics of gating at the apo-acetylcholine receptor transmitter binding site.

Authors:  Prasad Purohit; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate.

Authors:  D Colquhoun; B Sakmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Coupling between voltage sensor activation, Ca2+ binding and channel opening in large conductance (BK) potassium channels.

Authors:  Frank T Horrigan; Richard W Aldrich
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Detection and trapping of intermediate states priming nicotinic receptor channel opening.

Authors:  Nuriya Mukhtasimova; Won Yong Lee; Hai-Long Wang; Steven M Sine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Roles for N-terminal extracellular domains of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) β3 subunits in enhanced functional expression of mouse α6β2β3- and α6β4β3-nAChRs.

Authors:  Bhagirathi Dash; Ming D Li; Ronald J Lukas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.