Yingying Xu1, Kimberly Yolton, Jane Khoury. 1. General and Community Pediatrics Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, ML 7035, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of examination time on newborn neurobehavioral examinations administered within 48 hours of delivery and to identify the earliest appropriate time for performing the assessment. METHODS: We analyzed data from neurobehavioral examinations on 324 newborns using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Trends over examination time and cumulative percentage within published normal ranges were analyzed to identify the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination. Ordinal logistic regression and multivariate regression were used for testing and defining the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination without being influenced by acute effects of labor and delivery while controlling for several potential confounding factors. RESULTS: The arousal, excitability, lethargy, quality-of-movement, hypotonicity, and nonoptimal-reflexes scales were sensitive to timing of the examination. Results of ordinal logistic regression showed that 20 hours after delivery seemed to be the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations. The proportion of NNNS scores within the normal range increased with time significantly when the examination was made less than 20 hours after delivery (n = 148) (odds ratio: 1.12 [95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.23]), but there was no longer significant association with time of examination after 20 hours (n = 176) (odds ratio: 1.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.09]). This result was confirmed by multivariate regression. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend 20 hours after delivery as the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations to obtain results reflecting outcomes that are a representative assessment of newborn neurobehavior and not contaminated by acute effects of labor and delivery.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of examination time on newborn neurobehavioral examinations administered within 48 hours of delivery and to identify the earliest appropriate time for performing the assessment. METHODS: We analyzed data from neurobehavioral examinations on 324 newborns using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Trends over examination time and cumulative percentage within published normal ranges were analyzed to identify the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination. Ordinal logistic regression and multivariate regression were used for testing and defining the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination without being influenced by acute effects of labor and delivery while controlling for several potential confounding factors. RESULTS: The arousal, excitability, lethargy, quality-of-movement, hypotonicity, and nonoptimal-reflexes scales were sensitive to timing of the examination. Results of ordinal logistic regression showed that 20 hours after delivery seemed to be the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations. The proportion of NNNS scores within the normal range increased with time significantly when the examination was made less than 20 hours after delivery (n = 148) (odds ratio: 1.12 [95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.23]), but there was no longer significant association with time of examination after 20 hours (n = 176) (odds ratio: 1.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.09]). This result was confirmed by multivariate regression. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend 20 hours after delivery as the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations to obtain results reflecting outcomes that are a representative assessment of newborn neurobehavior and not contaminated by acute effects of labor and delivery.
Authors: Amy L Salisbury; Barry M Lester; Ronald Seifer; Linda Lagasse; Charles R Bauer; Seetha Shankaran; Henrietta Bada; Linda Wright; Jing Liu; Ken Poole Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Barry M Lester; Edward Z Tronick; Linda LaGasse; Ronald Seifer; Charles R Bauer; Seetha Shankaran; Henrietta S Bada; Linda L Wright; Vincent L Smeriglio; Jing Lu; Loretta P Finnegan; Penelope L Maza Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kimberly Yolton; Jane Khoury; Yingying Xu; Paul Succop; Bruce Lanphear; John T Bernert; Barry Lester Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Lynne M Smith; Linda L Lagasse; Chris Derauf; Penny Grant; Rizwan Shah; Amelia Arria; Marilyn Huestis; William Haning; Arthur Strauss; Sheri Della Grotta; Melissa Fallone; Jing Liu; Barry M Lester Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Sheela Sathyanarayana; Joe M Braun; Kimberly Yolton; Stacey Liddy; Bruce P Lanphear Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Abbey L Eeles; Jennifer M Walsh; Joy E Olsen; Rocco Cuzzilla; Deanne K Thompson; Peter J Anderson; Lex W Doyle; Jeanie L Y Cheong; Alicia J Spittle Journal: BMJ Paediatr Open Date: 2017-10-05