Literature DB >> 21172804

Regulation of fragile sites expression in budding yeast by MEC1, RRM3 and hydroxyurea.

Nadia Hashash1, Anthony L Johnson, Rita S Cha.   

Abstract

Fragile sites are specific loci within the genome that exhibit increased tendencies for chromosome breakage. They are conserved among mammals and are also found in lower eukaryotes including yeast and fly. Many conditions, including mutations and exogenous factors, contribute to fragile site expression, but the nature of interaction among them remains elusive. Here, we investigated this by examining the combined effects of rrm3Δ, mec1 and hydroxyurea (HU), three conditions that induce fragile sites, on expression of the replication slow zone (RSZ), a type of fragile site in budding yeast. Contrary to the expectation that each factor would contribute to fragile site expression in an independent manner, we show that rrm3Δ and high concentrations of HU suppressed RSZ expression in mec1-4ts cells. Further analyses revealed that rrm3Δ suppression occurs via promotion of Sml1 degradation, whereas HU suppresses RSZ via a premature commitment to inviability. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that: (1) the yeast genome contains different types of fragile site with regard to regulation of their expression, and (2) each fragile-site-inducing condition does not act independently, but can elicit a cellular response(s) that can paradoxically prevent the expression of a specific type(s) of fragile sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21172804      PMCID: PMC3010189          DOI: 10.1242/jcs.077313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  19 in total

1.  The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  X Zhao; A Chabes; V Domkin; L Thelander; R Rothstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-02       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Anna Azvolinsky; Paul G Giresi; Jason D Lieb; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

Authors:  José M Sogo; Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Loss of mitochondrial DNA under genotoxic stress conditions in the absence of the yeast DNA helicase Pif1p occurs independently of the DNA helicase Rrm3p.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Yong Qin; Andreas S Ivessa
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  T A Weinert; G L Kiser; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication.

Authors:  C Santocanale; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Andreas S Ivessa; Brian A Lenzmeier; Jessica B Bessler; Lara K Goudsouzian; Sandra L Schnakenberg; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Meiotic roles of Mec1, a budding yeast homolog of mammalian ATR/ATM.

Authors:  Jesús A Carballo; Rita S Cha
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability.

Authors:  Sarah Lambert; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  Identification of early replicating fragile sites that contribute to genome instability.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Barlow; Robert B Faryabi; Elsa Callén; Nancy Wong; Amy Malhowski; Hua Tang Chen; Gustavo Gutierrez-Cruz; Hong-Wei Sun; Peter McKinnon; George Wright; Rafael Casellas; Davide F Robbiani; Louis Staudt; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Mechanism of gene amplification via yeast autonomously replicating sequences.

Authors:  Shelly Sehgal; Sanjana Kaul; M K Dhar
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-01-20

4.  A Checkpoint-Related Function of the MCM Replicative Helicase Is Required to Avert Accumulation of RNA:DNA Hybrids during S-phase and Ensuing DSBs during G2/M.

Authors:  Sriram Vijayraghavan; Feng-Ling Tsai; Anthony Schwacha
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 5.  S-phase checkpoint regulations that preserve replication and chromosome integrity upon dNTP depletion.

Authors:  Michele Giannattasio; Dana Branzei
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Topoisomerase II- and condensin-dependent breakage of MEC1ATR-sensitive fragile sites occurs independently of spindle tension, anaphase, or cytokinesis.

Authors:  Nadia Hashash; Anthony L Johnson; Rita S Cha
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  The replication fork: understanding the eukaryotic replication machinery and the challenges to genome duplication.

Authors:  Adam R Leman; Eishi Noguchi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Common fragile sites: genomic hotspots of DNA damage and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Li Qiu; Kristin Mrasek; Jun Zhang; Thomas Liehr; Luciana Gonçalves Quintana; Zheng Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Rad53-Mediated Regulation of Rrm3 and Pif1 DNA Helicases Contributes to Prevention of Aberrant Fork Transitions under Replication Stress.

Authors:  Silvia Emma Rossi; Arta Ajazi; Walter Carotenuto; Marco Foiani; Michele Giannattasio
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Recombinogenic conditions influence partner choice in spontaneous mitotic recombination.

Authors:  James D Cauwood; Anthony L Johnson; Alexander Widger; Rita S Cha
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.