Literature DB >> 21172488

Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm mechanical prostheses: is patient-prosthesis mismatch a relevant phenomenon?

Andrea Garatti1, Francesca Mori, Francesco Innocente, Alberto Canziani, Piervincenzo Gagliardotto, Eugenio Mossuto, Tiberio Santoro, Vincenzo Montericcio, Alessandro Frigiola, Lorenzo Menicanti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the long-term performance of a consecutive cohort of patients implanted with a 17-mm bileaflet mechanical prosthesis.
METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 2005, 78 patients (74 women, mean age=71±12 years) underwent aortic valve replacement with a 17-mm mechanical bileaflet prosthesis (Sorin Bicarbon-Slim and St. Jude Medical-HP). Preoperative mean body surface area and New York Heart Association class were 1.6±0.2 m2 and 2.6±0.8, respectively. Preoperative mean aortic annulus, indexed aortic valve area, and peak and mean gradients were 18±1.6 mm, 0.42 cm2/m2, 89±32 mm Hg, and 56±21 mm Hg, respectively. Patients were divided into two groups, according to the presence (group A, 29 patients) or absence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (group B, 49 patients). Patient-prosthesis mismatch was defined by an indexed effective orifice area less than 0.85 cm2/m2.
RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 8.8%. Follow-up time averaged 86±44 months. Actuarial 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 83.7% and 65.3%, respectively. The mean postoperative New York Heart Association class was 1.3±0.6 (p<0.001). Overall indexed left ventricular mass decreased from 163±48 to 120±42 g/m2 (p<0.001), whereas average peak and mean prosthesis gradients were 28±9 mm Hg and 15±6 mm Hg, respectively (p<0.001). Early and long-term mortality were similar between the two groups as well as long-term hemodynamic performance (mean peak gradient was 28 mm Hg and 27 mm Hg in group A and B, respectively, not significant); left ventricular mass regression occurred similarly in both groups (indexed left ventricular mass at follow-up was 136±48 and 113±40 in group A and B, respectively; not significant).
CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with aortic stenosis experience satisfactory clinical improvement after aortic valve replacement with modern small-diameter bileaflet prostheses.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21172488     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Mid-term results of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves in elder patients with small aortic annuli: comparison with 19-mm bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  Hideki Teshima; Masahiko Ikebuchi; Toshikazu Sano; Ryuta Tai; Naohiro Horio; Hiroyuki Irie
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Kentaro Honda; Yoshitaka Okamura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-17

3.  Incidence and Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Isolated Aortic Valve Surgery.

Authors:  Selman Dumani; Ermal Likaj; Andi Kacani; Laureta Dibra; Elizana Petrela; Vera Beca; Ali Refatllari
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-15

4.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Yuichiro Kaminishi; Yoshio Misawa; Junjiro Kobayashi; Hiroaki Konishi; Hiroaki Miyata; Noboru Motomura; Shin-ichi Takamoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-13

5.  Seventeen-millimeter St. Jude Medical Regent valve in patients with small aortic annulus: dose moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch matter?

Authors:  Jia Hu; Hong Qian; Ya-jiao Li; Jun Gu; Jing Janice Zhao; Er-yong Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.