Literature DB >> 21172481

Results of completion arteriography after minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass.

Steven J Hoff1, Stephen K Ball, Marzia Leacche, Natalia Solenkova, Ramanan Umakanthan, Michael R Petracek, Rashid Ahmad, James P Greelish, Kristie Walker, John G Byrne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of a minimally invasive approach to off-pump coronary artery bypass remain controversial. The value of completion arteriography in validating this technique has not been investigated.
METHODS: From April 2007 to October 2009, fifty-six patients underwent isolated minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting through a left thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Forty-three of these patients underwent completion arteriography.
RESULTS: Sixty-five grafts were performed in these 56 patients, (average, 1.2 grafts per patient; range, 1 to 3). Forty-eight grafts were studied in the 43 patients undergoing completion arteriography. There were 4 findings on arteriogram leading to further immediate intervention (8.3%). These included 3 grafts with anastomotic stenoses or spasm requiring stent placement, and 1 patient who had limited dissection in the left internal mammary artery graft and underwent placement of an additional vein graft. These findings were independent of electrocardiographic changes or hemodynamic instability. The remainder of the studies showed no significant abnormalities. There were no deaths. One patient who did not have a completion arteriogram suffered a postoperative myocardial infarction requiring stent placement for anastomotic stenosis. Patients were discharged home an average of 6.8 days postoperatively. There were no instances of renal dysfunction postoperatively attributable to catheterization.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass is safe and effective. Findings of completion arteriography occasionally reveal previously under-recognized findings that, if corrected in a timely fashion, could potentially impact graft patency and clinical outcomes. Our experience validates this minimally invasive technique.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21172481     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.09.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

Review 1.  Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery?

Authors:  Maria Rodriguez; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

2.  Repeat Revascularization Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Traditional Sternotomy Techniques in 1468 Cases.

Authors:  Peter Olson; Michael Cinelli; Hamfreth S Rahming; Thomas Vazzana; Jonathan Spagnola; Emad Barsoum; Marc Assaad; Frank Tamburrino; James Lafferty
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Long-term Outcome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared with Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Elderly.

Authors:  Emad A Barsoum; Basem Azab; Nileshkumar Patel; Jonathan Spagnola; Masood A Shariff; Umar Kaleem; Rewais Morcus; Deepak Asti; Joseph T McGinn; James Lafferty; Donald A McCord
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2016-02-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.