BACKGROUND AIMS: Characterization of endothelial cell-biomaterial interaction is crucial for the development of blood-contacting biomedical devices and implants. However, a crucial parameter that has largely been overlooked is the cell-seeding density. METHODS: This study investigated how varying cell-seeding density influences human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation on three different substrata: gelatin, tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) and poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA). RESULTS: The fastest proliferation was seen on gelatin, followed by TCPS and PLLA, regardless of seeding density. On both TCPS and gelatin, maximal proliferation was attained at an initial seeding density of 1000 cells/cm(2). At seeding densities above and below 1000 cells/cm(2), the proliferation rate decreased sharply. On PLLA, there was a decrease in cell numbers over 7 days of culture, below a certain threshold seeding density (c. 2500-3000 cells/cm(2)), which meant that some of the cells were dying off rather than proliferating. Above this threshold seeding density, HUVEC displayed slow proliferation. Subsequently, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of eight gene markers associated with adhesion and endothelial functionality (VEGF-A, integrin-α5, VWF, ICAM1, ICAM2, VE-cadherin, endoglin and PECAM1) was carried out on HUVEC seeded at varying densities on the three substrata. A significant downregulation of gene expression was observed at an ultralow cell-seeding density of 100 cells/cm(2). This was accompanied by an extremely slow proliferation rate, probably because of an acute lack of intercellular contacts and paracrine signaling. CONCLUSION: Hence, this study demonstrates that seeding density has a profound effect on the proliferation and gene expression profile of endothelial cells seeded on different biomaterial surfaces.
BACKGROUND AIMS: Characterization of endothelial cell-biomaterial interaction is crucial for the development of blood-contacting biomedical devices and implants. However, a crucial parameter that has largely been overlooked is the cell-seeding density. METHODS: This study investigated how varying cell-seeding density influences human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation on three different substrata: gelatin, tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) and poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA). RESULTS: The fastest proliferation was seen on gelatin, followed by TCPS and PLLA, regardless of seeding density. On both TCPS and gelatin, maximal proliferation was attained at an initial seeding density of 1000 cells/cm(2). At seeding densities above and below 1000 cells/cm(2), the proliferation rate decreased sharply. On PLLA, there was a decrease in cell numbers over 7 days of culture, below a certain threshold seeding density (c. 2500-3000 cells/cm(2)), which meant that some of the cells were dying off rather than proliferating. Above this threshold seeding density, HUVEC displayed slow proliferation. Subsequently, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of eight gene markers associated with adhesion and endothelial functionality (VEGF-A, integrin-α5, VWF, ICAM1, ICAM2, VE-cadherin, endoglin and PECAM1) was carried out on HUVEC seeded at varying densities on the three substrata. A significant downregulation of gene expression was observed at an ultralow cell-seeding density of 100 cells/cm(2). This was accompanied by an extremely slow proliferation rate, probably because of an acute lack of intercellular contacts and paracrine signaling. CONCLUSION: Hence, this study demonstrates that seeding density has a profound effect on the proliferation and gene expression profile of endothelial cells seeded on different biomaterial surfaces.
Authors: Joshua A Wood; Clayton T McKee; Sara M Thomasy; Marion E Fischer; Nihar M Shah; Christopher J Murphy; Paul Russell Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Xiaokun Wang; Zvi Schwartz; Rolando A Gittens; Alice Cheng; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Haifeng Chen; Barbara D Boyan Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Alena O Stepanova; Petr P Laktionov; Anna V Cherepanova; Vera S Chernonosova; Georgiy Yu Shevelev; Ivan A Zaporozhchenko; Alexander M Karaskov; Pavel P Laktionov Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: V H M Mouser; A Abbadessa; R Levato; W E Hennink; T Vermonden; D Gawlitta; J Malda Journal: Biofabrication Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 9.954
Authors: Na An; Oleh Andrukhov; Yan Tang; Frank Falkensammer; Hans-Peter Bantleon; Xiangying Ouyang; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gerard Rubí-Sans; Lourdes Recha-Sancho; Soledad Pérez-Amodio; Miguel Ángel Mateos-Timoneda; Carlos Eduardo Semino; Elisabeth Engel Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2019-12-28