Literature DB >> 21171805

When does length cause the word length effect?

Annie Jalbert1, Ian Neath, Tamra J Bireta, Aimée M Surprenant.   

Abstract

The word length effect, the finding that lists of short words are better recalled than lists of long words, has been termed one of the benchmark findings that any theory of immediate memory must account for. Indeed, the effect led directly to the development of working memory and the phonological loop, and it is viewed as the best remaining evidence for time-based decay. However, previous studies investigating this effect have confounded length with orthographic neighborhood size. In the present study, Experiments 1A and 1B revealed typical effects of length when short and long words were equated on all relevant dimensions previously identified in the literature except for neighborhood size. In Experiment 2, consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words with a large orthographic neighborhood were better recalled than were CVC words with a small orthographic neighborhood. In Experiments 3 and 4, using two different sets of stimuli, we showed that when short (1-syllable) and long (3-syllable) items were equated for neighborhood size, the word length effect disappeared. Experiment 5 replicated this with spoken recall. We suggest that the word length effect may be better explained by the differences in linguistic and lexical properties of short and long words rather than by length per se. These results add to the growing literature showing problems for theories of memory that include decay offset by rehearsal as a central feature. 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21171805     DOI: 10.1037/a0021804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  19 in total

1.  Revisiting backward recall and benchmark memory effects: a reply to Bireta et al. (2010).

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Samantha C Burns; Cindy Chamberland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Does learning to read shape verbal working memory?

Authors:  Catherine Demoulin; Régine Kolinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Does length or neighborhood size cause the word length effect?

Authors:  Annie Jalbert; Ian Neath; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

4.  The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition.

Authors:  Meng-Feng Li; Wei-Chun Lin; Tai-Li Chou; Fu-Ling Yang; Jei-Tun Wu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-06

5.  Interpreting potential markers of storage and rehearsal: Implications for studies of verbal short-term memory and neuropsychological cases.

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Robert H Logie; Christopher Jarrold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

6.  Does neighborhood size really cause the word length effect?

Authors:  Dominic Guitard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Gerald Tehan; Anne Tolan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

7.  Slave systems in verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters; David Howard
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

9.  Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Lauren R Spiegel; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.