K W Whitworth1, D D Baird, L C Stene, R Skjaerven, M P Longnecker. 1. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop A3-05, Durham, NC 27709, USA. whitworthkw@niehs.nih.gov
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We assessed the effects of type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes on fecundability (as manifest by increased time-to-pregnancy [TTP]) in a large cohort of pregnant women. METHODS: This study is based on the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Members of this large cohort were enrolled early in pregnancy and asked about TTP and other factors. Among the 58,004 women included in the analysis, we identified 221 cases of type 1 diabetes and 88 cases of type 2 diabetes using the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. A logistic analogue of the proportional probability model, a Cox-like discrete-time model, was used to compute fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% CI for type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, adjusted for maternal age and prepregnancy BMI. RESULTS: Compared with non-diabetic women, the adjusted FOR for women with type 1 diabetes was 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.89) and the adjusted FOR for women with type 2 diabetes was 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.84). These FORs did not change substantively and remained statistically significant after excluding women with irregular menstrual cycles and accounting for cycle length. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The results from the present study provide evidence of substantially decreased fecundability for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, even among those with a normal menstrual cycle.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We assessed the effects of type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes on fecundability (as manifest by increased time-to-pregnancy [TTP]) in a large cohort of pregnant women. METHODS: This study is based on the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Members of this large cohort were enrolled early in pregnancy and asked about TTP and other factors. Among the 58,004 women included in the analysis, we identified 221 cases of type 1 diabetes and 88 cases of type 2 diabetes using the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. A logistic analogue of the proportional probability model, a Cox-like discrete-time model, was used to compute fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% CI for type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, adjusted for maternal age and prepregnancy BMI. RESULTS: Compared with non-diabeticwomen, the adjusted FOR for women with type 1 diabetes was 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.89) and the adjusted FOR for women with type 2 diabetes was 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.84). These FORs did not change substantively and remained statistically significant after excluding women with irregular menstrual cycles and accounting for cycle length. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The results from the present study provide evidence of substantially decreased fecundability for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, even among those with a normal menstrual cycle.
Authors: Elsa S Strotmeyer; Ann R Steenkiste; Thomas P Foley; Sarah L Berga; Janice S Dorman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: C Kim; R S Miller; B H Braffett; Y Pan; V L Arends; A K Saenger; A Barnie; A V Sarma Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Gayle Johnson; Richard F MacLehose; Donna D Baird; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Katherine E Hartmann Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Qasim Ayub; Loukas Moutsianas; Yuan Chen; Kalliope Panoutsopoulou; Vincenza Colonna; Luca Pagani; Inga Prokopenko; Graham R S Ritchie; Chris Tyler-Smith; Mark I McCarthy; Eleftheria Zeggini; Yali Xue Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: C Wildenschild; A H Riis; V Ehrenstein; E E Hatch; L A Wise; K J Rothman; H T Sørensen; E M Mikkelsen Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Antonio F Pardiñas; Peter Holmans; Andrew J Pocklington; Valentina Escott-Price; Stephan Ripke; Noa Carrera; Sophie E Legge; Sophie Bishop; Darren Cameron; Marian L Hamshere; Jun Han; Leon Hubbard; Amy Lynham; Kiran Mantripragada; Elliott Rees; James H MacCabe; Steven A McCarroll; Bernhard T Baune; Gerome Breen; Enda M Byrne; Udo Dannlowski; Thalia C Eley; Caroline Hayward; Nicholas G Martin; Andrew M McIntosh; Robert Plomin; David J Porteous; Naomi R Wray; Armando Caballero; Daniel H Geschwind; Laura M Huckins; Douglas M Ruderfer; Enrique Santiago; Pamela Sklar; Eli A Stahl; Hyejung Won; Esben Agerbo; Thomas D Als; Ole A Andreassen; Marie Bækvad-Hansen; Preben Bo Mortensen; Carsten Bøcker Pedersen; Anders D Børglum; Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm; Srdjan Djurovic; Naser Durmishi; Marianne Giørtz Pedersen; Vera Golimbet; Jakob Grove; David M Hougaard; Manuel Mattheisen; Espen Molden; Ole Mors; Merete Nordentoft; Milica Pejovic-Milovancevic; Engilbert Sigurdsson; Teimuraz Silagadze; Christine Søholm Hansen; Kari Stefansson; Hreinn Stefansson; Stacy Steinberg; Sarah Tosato; Thomas Werge; David A Collier; Dan Rujescu; George Kirov; Michael J Owen; Michael C O'Donovan; James T R Walters Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: See Ling Loy; Chee Wai Ku; Ada En Qi Lai; Xin Hui Choo; Angela Hui Min Ho; Yin Bun Cheung; Keith M Godfrey; Yap-Seng Chong; Peter D Gluckman; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Kok Hian Tan; Fabian Kok Peng Yap; Shiao-Yng Chan; Jerry Kok Yen Chan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 7.329