| Literature DB >> 21170189 |
Mandakini Maharana1, Narayani Krishnan, D Sengupta.
Abstract
The concentrations of natural radionuclides in surface soil samples around selected villages of Jaduguda were investigated and compared with the radioactivity level in the region. Concentrations of (238)U, (232)Th, and (40)K were determined by a gamma ray spectrometer using the HPGe detector with 50% relative efficiency, and the radiation dose to the local population was estimated. The average estimated activity concentrations of (238)U, (232)Th, and (40)K in the surface soil were 53.8, 44.2 and 464.2 Bq kg(-1) respectively. The average absorbed dose rate in the study area was estimated to be 72.5 nGy h-1, where as the annual effective dose to the population was 0.09 mSv y-1. A correlation analysis was made between measured dose rate and individual radionuclides, in order to delineate the contribution of the respective nuclides towards dose rate. The radio-elemental concentrations of uranium, thorium and potassium estimated for the soils, in the study area, indicated the enrichment of uranium series nuclide. The results of the present study were subsequently compared with international and national recommended values.Entities:
Keywords: Gamma dose; HPGe; Natural radioactivity; singhbhum shear zone; surface soil
Year: 2010 PMID: 21170189 PMCID: PMC2990119 DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.71762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Phys ISSN: 0971-6203
Figure 1Geological map of Jaduguda along with the sampling villages
Figure 2Typical gamma spectrum obtained from the HPGe spectrometer
Activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K in soil samples around Jaduguda
| Ichera (6) | 31.2 ± 2.5 | 50.1 ± 2.1 | 468.9 ± 38.6 |
| Tilaitarn (4) | 20.1 ± 2.4 | 23.8 ± 1.8 | 405.5 ± 25.7 |
| North Dungridih (4) | 118.5 ± 4.5 | 47.8 ± 2.1 | 513.8 ± 27.2 |
| South Dungridih (4) | 120.0 ± 4.3 | 69.9 ± 2.6 | 513.0 ± 29.6 |
| Chatikocha (4) | 40.7 ± 3.2 | 50.1 ± 2.2 | 441.9 ± 28.9 |
| Bhatin (5) | 21.8 ± 2.1 | 27.2 ± 1.9 | 396.5 ± 25.7 |
| Kalikapur (2) | 24.0 ± 2.0 | 40.5 ± 2.0 | 562.6 ± 31.7 |
| Range | 20.1±120.0 | 23.8±69.9 | 396.5–513.8 |
| AM | 53.8 ± 3 | 42.2 ± 2.1 | 471.7 ± 29.6 |
| SD | 45.2 | 15.6 | 61.4 |
± value indicates the error associated with the measurement, n indicates the number of samples from respective villages
Figure 3Frequency distribution of 238U, 232Th, and 40K concentration in the soil samples from Jaduguda
Comparison of the results obtained from soil samples of Jaduguda with other countries
| Reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaduguda (villages) | 53.8 | 45.0 | 464.2 | Present study |
| Jaduguda | 50.67–109.14 | 28.73–89.78 | 989.84–1121.86 | Chakrabarty |
| Roadside soil, Musabani–Jamshedpur road (India) | 16.6–390.5 | 21.1–148.2 | 85.9–881.6 | Sahoo |
| West coast of India | 30.6 | 38.2 | 152.2 | Karunakara |
| Spain | 46 | 49 | 650 | Moreno |
| Turkey | 115 | 192 | 1207 | Baykara and Doğru |
| China | 112 | 71.5 | 672 | Yang |
| Botswana | 34.8 | 41.8 | 432.7 | Murty |
| World average | 35 | 45 | 420 | UNSCEAR[ |
Air-absorbed dose rate and annual effective dose at the villages of Jaduguda
| Ichera | 66.6 | 0.08 | 0.37 |
| Tilaitarn | 41.8 | 0.05 | 0.23 |
| North Dungridih | 105.2 | 0.13 | 0.61 |
| South Dungridih | 119.6 | 0.15 | 0.70 |
| Chatikocha | 69.5 | 0.08 | 0.40 |
| Bhatin | 43.1 | 0.05 | 0.25 |
| Kalikapur | 59.1 | 0.07 | 0.34 |
| Range | 41.8–119.6 | 0.05–0.15 | 0.23–0.70 |
| Average | 72.1 | 0.09 | 0.41 |
| SD | 29.7 | 0.03 | 0.17 |
Figure 4Scatter plot of the 238U versus measured dose rate
Figure 6Scatter plot of the 40K versus measured dose rate
Figure 5Scatter plot of the 232Th versus measured dose rate
Figure 7The 3D plots of Isodose map of Jaduguda showing the sampling villages