Literature DB >> 21170173

Minimal formulation of joint motion for biomechanisms.

Ajay Seth1, Michael Sherman, Peter Eastman, Scott Delp.   

Abstract

Biomechanical systems share many properties with mechanically engineered systems, and researchers have successfully employed mechanical engineering simulation software to investigate the mechanical behavior of diverse biological mechanisms, ranging from biomolecules to human joints. Unlike their man-made counterparts, however, biomechanisms rarely exhibit the simple, uncoupled, pure-axial motion that is engineered into mechanical joints such as sliders, pins, and ball-and-socket joints. Current mechanical modeling software based on internal-coordinate multibody dynamics can formulate engineered joints directly in minimal coordinates, but requires additional coordinates restricted by constraints to model more complex motions. This approach can be inefficient, inaccurate, and difficult for biomechanists to customize. Since complex motion is the rule rather than the exception in biomechanisms, the benefits of minimal coordinate modeling are not fully realized in biomedical research. Here we introduce a practical implementation for empirically-defined internal-coordinate joints, which we call "mobilizers." A mobilizer encapsulates the observations, measurement frame, and modeling requirements into a hinge specification of the permissible-motion manifold for a minimal set of internal coordinates. Mobilizers support nonlinear mappings that are mathematically equivalent to constraint manifolds but have the advantages of fewer coordinates, no constraints, and exact representation of the biomechanical motion-space-the benefits long enjoyed for internal-coordinate models of mechanical joints. Hinge matrices within the mobilizer are easily specified by user-supplied functions, and provide a direct means of mapping permissible motion derived from empirical data. We present computational results showing substantial performance and accuracy gains for mobilizers versus equivalent joints implemented with constraints. Examples of mobilizers for joints from human biomechanics and molecular dynamics are given. All methods and examples were implemented in Simbody™-an open source multibody-dynamics solver available at https://Simtk.org.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21170173      PMCID: PMC3002261          DOI: 10.1007/s11071-010-9717-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn        ISSN: 0924-090X            Impact factor:   5.022


  30 in total

1.  The components of passive knee movement are coupled to flexion angle.

Authors:  D R Wilson; J D Feikes; A B Zavatsky; J J O'Connor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Knee pain and joint loading in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; A R Ryals; J A Block; L Sharma; T J Schnitzer; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Internal coordinates for molecular dynamics and minimization in structure determination and refinement.

Authors:  C D Schwieters; G M Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Predicting allosteric communication in myosin via a pathway of conserved residues.

Authors:  Susan Tang; Jung-Chi Liao; Alexander R Dunn; Russ B Altman; James A Spudich; Jeanette P Schmidt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  The shape of the acetabular cartilage surface: a geometric morphometric study using three-dimensional scanning.

Authors:  Dongyun Gu; Yazhu Chen; Kerong Dai; Su Zhang; Jianbin Yuan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Flap opening mechanism of HIV-1 protease.

Authors:  Gergely Tóth; Attila Borics
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 2.518

7.  A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism.

Authors:  G T Yamaguchi; F E Zajac
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds.

Authors:  May Q Liu; Frank C Anderson; Michael H Schwartz; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Development and validation of a 3-D model to predict knee joint loading during dynamic movement.

Authors:  S G McLean; A Su; A J van den Bogert
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  12 in total

1.  WHAT IS A MOMENT ARM? CALCULATING MUSCLE EFFECTIVENESS IN BIOMECHANICAL MODELS USING GENERALIZED COORDINATES.

Authors:  Michael A Sherman; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Proc ASME Des Eng Tech Conf       Date:  2013-08

2.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Cortical and subcortical areas involved in the regulation of reach movement speed in the human brain: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Seyyed Iman Shirinbayan; Alexander M Dreyer; Jochem W Rieger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Compressive tibiofemoral force during crouch gait.

Authors:  Katherine M Steele; Matthew S Demers; Michael H Schwartz; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  OpenSim: a musculoskeletal modeling and simulation framework for in silico investigations and exchange.

Authors:  Ajay Seth; Michael Sherman; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Procedia IUTAM       Date:  2011

6.  Simbody: multibody dynamics for biomedical research.

Authors:  Michael A Sherman; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Procedia IUTAM       Date:  2011

7.  An Open-Source Toolbox for Surrogate Modeling of Joint Contact Mechanics.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running.

Authors:  Samuel R Hamner; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Bioinspired Technologies to Connect Musculoskeletal Mechanobiology to the Person for Training and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; David G Lloyd; Rod S Barrett; Jill L Cook; Ming H Zheng; Thor F Besier; David J Saxby
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  A Biomechanical Model of the Scapulothoracic Joint to Accurately Capture Scapular Kinematics during Shoulder Movements.

Authors:  Ajay Seth; Ricardo Matias; António P Veloso; Scott L Delp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.