Literature DB >> 21168904

Twelve-year experience with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Xiaojian Yan1, Guangyi Li, Huiling Shang, Gang Wang, Yubin Han, Tiecheng Lin, Feiyun Zheng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the morbidity, oncological outcome, and prognostic factors of cervical cancer patients treated with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LRH).
METHODS: Patients with cervical cancer undergoing LRH at the First People's Hospital of Foshan between August 1998 and March 2010 were enrolled in this study. The medical records were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were identified. According to FIGO stage, the number of patients with stage Ia2, Ib1, Ib2, IIa, and IIb was 2, 163, 34, 35, and 6, respectively. The conversion rate was 1.25%. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 7.08% and 9.16% patients, respectively. Other medical problems included 74 cases (30%) of bladder dysfunction. Excluding the lost cases, the median follow-up of 221 cases was 35 months, and 5-year survival rate for Ia2, Ib1, Ib2, IIa was 100%, 82%, 66%, 60%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed factors impacting the survival rate were FIGO stage>Ib1, non-squamous histologic type, deep cervical stromal invasion, and lymph node metastasis (P=0.027, 0.023, 0.007, 0.000). The Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that only lymph node metastasis (OR=3.827, P=0.000) was independent of poor prognostic factor. The 5-year survival rates in Ib1 were 88% with negative lymph nodes and 59% with positive lymph nodes (P=0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that LRH can be performed in stage Ia2-Ib1 or less advanced node negative cervical cancer patients without compromising survival. The feasibility of LRH for more advanced patients needs further investigations.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21168904     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

1.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Survival after Laparoscopic versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Luciana Silveira Campos; Leo Francisco Limberger; Airton Teltebom Stein; Jose Manuel Caldas
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fangjie He; Songhua Yuan; Xia Chen; Siyou Zhang; Yubin Han; Tiecheng Lin; Bingnan Xu; Shimin Huang; Zhiyin Pan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 4.711

4.  Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Luciana Silveira Campos; Leo Francisco Limberger; Airton Tetelbom Stein; Antonio Nocchi Kalil
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore.

Authors:  Timothy Yong Kuei Lim; Krystal Koh Miao Lin; Wai Loong Wong; Ieera Madan Aggarwal; Philip Kwai Lam Yam
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2019-04-29

6.  Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma R Allanson; Aime Powell; Max Bulsara; Hong Lim Lee; Lynette Denny; Yee Leung; Paul Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Total Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer: An Observational Study of 13-Year Experience.

Authors:  Meizhu Xiao; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Unexpected result of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Yoichi Aoki; Nobuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.401

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.