Literature DB >> 21168881

Satisfaction and patient experience with sacral neuromodulation: results of a single center sample survey.

Randall K Leong1, Tom A Marcelissen, Fred H Nieman, Rob A De Bie, Philip E Van Kerrebroeck, Stefan G De Wachter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We systematically assessed long-term satisfaction and patient experience with sacral nerve modulation therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who received sacral neuromodulation between 1990 and 2007 at our center and who still had the implant were included in the survey. All received a postal questionnaire regarding satisfaction and experiences with the system, such as side effects, complications, burden, impact on sexuality and defecation changes.
RESULTS: Of the 275 questionnaires sent 207 were returned for a 75% response rate. The population was 83% female. Overall treatment was done for overactive bladder syndrome, nonobstructive urinary retention, combined overactive bladder and retention, and pelvic pain in 55%, 24%, 20% and 1% of patients, respectively. Overall satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation was high at 90%. No correlations were found between the satisfaction rate, and pretreatment age, gender, complaint type, sexual dysfunction or therapy duration. However, 56% of patients reported side effects, such as pain at the internal nerve stimulator site and due to stimulation. However, 89% of these patients did not seek further therapy. Of patients with additional defecation problems 47% experienced relief of complaints.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a high satisfaction rate in patients with sacral neuromodulation. There was no relation between patient age, complaint type, therapy duration or side effects and the satisfaction rate. The number of side effects was limited but further analysis in prospective cohorts should identify patients who are likely to have side effects or stop sacral neuromodulation treatment. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21168881     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  Sacral neuromodulation: an effective treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Federica Puccini; Alka Bhide; Suzy Elneil; G Alessandro Digesu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Role of sacral neuromodulation in modern urogynaecology practice: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Samina Tahseen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Patients with medication-refractory OAB symptoms should be further treated with neuromodulation.

Authors:  Jerzy B Gajewski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Concerns regarding sacral neuromodulation as a treatment option for medical-refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Luc Valiquette
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.

Authors:  Jacques Corcos; Mikolaj Przydacz; Lysanne Campeau; Gary Gray; Duane Hickling; Christiane Honeine; Sidney B Radomski; Lynn Stothers; Adrian Wagg; Frcp Lond
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  What Is the Role of Additional Pharmacotherapy and Neuromodulation in Patients with Marginal Benefit from Botulinum Toxin Injection?

Authors:  Patricia M Zahner; Laura L Giusto; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Results of sacral nerve neuromodulation for double incontinence in adults.

Authors:  M Chodez; B Trilling; C Thuillier; B Boillot; S Barbois; J-L Faucheron
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Patient preferences for treating refractory overactive bladder in the UK.

Authors:  Hashim Hashim; Kathleen Beusterien; John F P Bridges; Kaitlan Amos; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Sacral neuromodulation versus onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory urgency urinary incontinence: impact on fecal incontinence symptoms and sexual function.

Authors:  Uduak U Andy; Cindy L Amundsen; Emily Honeycutt; Alayne D Markland; Gena Dunivan; Keisha Y Dyer; Nicole B Korbly; Megan Bradley; Sandip Vasavada; Donna Mazloomdoost; Sonia Thomas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Fowler's Syndrome-The Cause of Urinary Retention in Young Women, Often Forgotten, but Significant and Challenging to Treat.

Authors:  Jacek K Szymański; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.