Literature DB >> 21168658

The impact of postoperative infection on long-term outcomes in liver transplantation.

A J Cockbain1, P J Goldsmith, M Gouda, M Attia, S G Pollard, J P A Lodge, K R Prasad, G J Toogood.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative infection (POI) prolongs inpatient stay, delays return to normal activity, and may be detrimental to long-term survival after cancer resections. This study sought to identify the impact of postoperative infection on liver transplantation outcomes.
METHODS: We analyzed our prospective database of 910 adult patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2000 and 2010 in a single UK center. POI was defined as pyrexia plus positive cultures from blood, sputum, urine, wound, or ascitic fluid. Patient demographic features and perioperative variables were analyzed for their effects on POI. The impacts of POI on overall survival (OS) and graft survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests for significance, before entry into a multivariate regression analysis. We analyzed the effects of POI on the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the incidence of acute rejection episodes and readmissions within 1 year as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Patients who developed a postoperative chest or wound infection showed poorer OS at a mean of 7.0 versus 8.8 years (P = .009) and 7.0 versus 8.8 years (P = .003), respectively. Infection in blood, ascitic fluid, or urine showed no significant impact on survival. LOS was significantly increased among patients with a wound (median 21 vs 17 days, P = .011), a sputum (median 24 vs 17 days, P < .001), or a blood infection (median 32 vs 17 days, P < .001). Higher rates of intraoperative blood transfusion were observed among subjects who developed a chest or a wound infection. There was no difference in other variables between those who did versus did not develop an infection. Upon multivariate analysis, wound infection was the strongest independent predictor of OS (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that wound or chest infections were associated with poorer OS. More aggressive prophylactic and/or therapeutic interventions targeting specific sites of infection may represent a simple and cost-effective measure to reduce hospital stay and improve OS.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21168658     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

1.  Surgical complications in 275 HIV-infected liver and/or kidney transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Jack Harbell; John Fung; Nicholas Nissen; Kim Olthoff; Sander S Florman; Douglas W Hanto; Jimmy Light; Steve T Bartlett; Andreas G Tzakis; Thomas C Pearson; Burc Barin; Michelle E Roland; Peter G Stock
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of complications following deceased donor liver transplant.

Authors:  Lisa M McElroy; Amna Daud; Ashley E Davis; Brittany Lapin; Talia Baker; Michael M Abecassis; Josh Levitsky; Jane L Holl; Daniela P Ladner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Vacuum-assisted management of surgical site infections after liver transplantation: 15-year experience in a tertiary hepatobiliary center.

Authors:  Paolo Magistri; Tiziana Olivieri; Valentina Serra; Giuseppe Tarantino; Giacomo Assirati; Annarita Pecchi; Roberto Ballarin; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-08-24

4.  Analysis of infections in the first 3-month after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Chuan Li; Tian-Fu Wen; Kai Mi; Chuan Wang; Lu-Nan Yan; Bo Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.