Literature DB >> 21168132

Creation of a neovagina in Rokitansky syndrome: comparison between two laparoscopic techniques.

Stefano Bianchi1, Giada Frontino, Nevio Ciappina, Elisa Restelli, Luigi Fedele.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare Vecchietti's and Davydov's laparoscopic techniques for creation of a neovagina in patients with Rokitansky syndrome.
DESIGN: Comparative retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center for the treatment of Rokitansky syndrome. PATIENT(S): Eighty patients with Rokitansky syndrome. INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent surgical creation of a neovagina. Fifteen patients who underwent the Vecchietti procedure from October 2003 to December 2004 and 30 patients who underwent the Davydov procedure from June 2005 to August 2008 were also included from two previously published studies. Follow-up lasted at least 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative parameters and anatomic results were compared. Functional results were compared through the Female Sexual Function Index. Epithelization of the neovagina was assessed in both groups through vaginoscopy and Schiller's test. RESULT(S): No major intraoperative complications were encountered in either group. Mean (±SD) duration of surgery was 30 ± 9.6 and 134 ± 24 minutes in Vecchietti's and Davydov's approach, respectively. At 12 postoperative months, length and width of the neovagina in the two groups were 7.5 ± 1.1 and 2.8 ± 0.6 cm, and 8.5 ± 1.6 and 2.8 ± 0.65, respectively. Epithelization of the neovagina at 6-month follow-up was 60% and 80%, respectively, and 100% in both groups at 12 postoperative months. CONCLUSION(S): Anatomic and functional outcomes of the two approaches tend to be comparable at 12-month follow-up; the only significant difference seems to be in greater length for the neovagina obtained by Davydov's approach.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21168132     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah K McQuillan; Sonia R Grover
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comparison of two laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty techniques in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Xiwa Zhao; Ruixue Wang; Yanxiu Wang; Li Li; Haibo Zhang; Shan Kang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty with laparoscopic sigmoid vaginoplasty for treating congenital vaginal agenesis.

Authors:  Lili Cao; Yanzhou Wang; Yudi Li; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Systematic review of sexual function and satisfaction following the management of vaginal agenesis.

Authors:  Sarah K McQuillan; Sonia R Grover
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty and sigmoid colon vaginoplasty performed during radical surgery for primary vaginal carcinoma.

Authors:  Fengqiu Yao; Weidong Zhao; Gang Chen; Aijun Zhang; Fanglin Sun; Weiping Hu; Bin Ling
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Plastic neo-vaginal construction in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: an expert opinion paper on the decision-making treatment process.

Authors:  Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche; Rajesh Devassy; Sreelatha Gopalakrishnan; Maya Sophie de Wilde; Anja Herrmann; Angelika Larbig; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-02-03

7.  Sexual Life of Women With Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome After Laparoscopic Vecchietti Vaginoplasty.

Authors:  Zlatko Pastor; Jiří Froněk; Marta Nováčková; Roman Chmel
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.491

8.  Effects of different vaginal mould use approaches after vaginoplasty with artificial dermis in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Wenli Wang; Fang Chen; Jiumei Cheng; Shuyan Peng; Hong Ye
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Comparison of two laparoscopic vaginoplasties using a single peritoneal flap in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Xiwa Zhao; Yanan Zhang; Mengmeng Zhang; Haibo Zhang; Yunjie Tian; Shan Kang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.932

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.