Literature DB >> 21168023

Complex coronary anatomy in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: impact of complex coronary anatomy in modern bypass surgery? Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial after two years.

Friedrich W Mohr1, Ardawan J Rastan, Patrick W Serruys, A Pieter Kappetein, David R Holmes, Jose L Pomar, Stephen Westaby, Katrin Leadley, Keith D Dawkins, Michael J Mack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: SYNTAX study compares outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with 3-vessel and/or left main disease. Complexity of coronary artery disease was quantified by the SYNTAX score, which combines anatomic characteristics of each significant lesion. This study aims to clarify whether SYNTAX score affects the outcome of bypass grafting as defined by major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCE) and its components over a 2-year follow-up period.
METHODS: Of the 3075 patients enrolled in SYNTAX, 1541 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (897 randomized controlled trial patients, and 644 registry patients). All patients undergoing bypass grafting were stratified according to their SYNTAX score into 3 tertiles: low (0-22), intermediate (22-32), and high (≥33) complexity. Clinical outcomes up to 2 years after allocation were determined for each group and further risk factor analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Registry patients had more complex disease than those in the randomized controlled trial (SYNTAX score: registry 37.8 ± 13.3 vs randomized 29.1 ± 11.4; P < .001). At 30 days, overall coronary bypass mortality was 0.9% (registry 0.6% vs randomized 1.2%). MACCE rate at 30 days was 4.4% (registry 3.4% vs randomized 5.2%). SYNTAX score did not significantly affect overall 2-year MACCE rate of 15.6% for low, 14.3% for medium, and 15.4% for high SYNTAX scores. Compared with randomized patients, registry patients had a lower rate of overall MACCE rate (registry 13.0% vs randomized 16.7%; P = .046) and repeat revascularization (4.7% vs 8.6%; P = .003), whereas other event rates were comparable. Risk factor analysis revealed left main disease (P = .049) and incomplete revascularization (P = .005) as predictive for adverse 2-year outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting was excellent and independent from the SYNTAX score. Incomplete revascularization rather than degree of coronary complexity adversely affects late outcomes of coronary bypass.
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21168023     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  28 in total

1.  Bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main disease. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Desch; E Boudriot; A Rastan; P E Buszman; A Bochenek; F W Mohr; G Schuler; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  [Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines].

Authors:  A Thiem; T Attmann; J Cremer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization: definitions, assessment and outcomes.

Authors:  Prakriti Gaba; Bernard J Gersh; Ziad A Ali; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Why coronary artery bypass surgery is still the optimal treatment strategy for left main stem disease: an evidence-based review with a Malaysian surgical perspective.

Authors:  Anand Sachithanandan; Balaji Badmanaban
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2011-01-01

5.  Secondary prevention for CABG patients: take two arterial grafts at the time of your coronary operation.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Antonino Di Franco; Filippo Crea; Leonard N Girardi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  [ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization : Amendments 2014].

Authors:  H Nef; M Renker; C W Hamm
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  SYNTAX Score and Outcomes of Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Amartya Kundu; Partha Sardar; Kevin O'Day; Saurav Chatterjee; Theophilus Owan; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Incentive spirometry for preventing pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  Eliane R F S Freitas; Bernardo G O Soares; Jefferson R Cardoso; Álvaro N Atallah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 9.  Utilizing risk scores in determining the optimal revascularization strategy for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Vasim Farooq; Salvatore Brugaletta; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  The effects of clinical and angiographic aspects of coronary artery disease on the cardiac autonomic function: a single-center prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdelnabi; Moataz Zaki; Mohamed Sadaka; Moustafa Nawar
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.