Literature DB >> 21167727

Is off-pump superior to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease?

Maximilian Y Emmert1, Sacha P Salzberg, Burkhardt Seifert, Hector Rodriguez, Andre Plass, Simon P Hoerstrup, Jürg Grünenfelder, Volkmar Falk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic patients often present with diffuse coronary disease than nondiabetic patients posing a greater surgical challenge during off-pump revascularization. In this study, the safety, feasibility, and completeness of revascularization for this subset of patients was assessed.
METHODS: From 2002 to 2008, 1015 diabetic patients underwent myocardial revascularization. Patients received either off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB; n = 540; 53%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 475; 47%). Data collection was performed prospectively and data analysis was done by propensity-score (PS)-adjusted regression analysis. Primary endpoints were mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and a composite endpoint including major noncardiac adverse events (MNCAEs) such as respiratory failure, renal failure, and rethoracotomy for bleeding was applied. An index of complete revascularization (ICOR) was defined to assess complete revascularization by dividing the total number of distal anastomoses by the number of diseased vessels. Complete revascularization was assumed when ICOR was >1.
RESULTS: OPCAB patients had a significantly lower mortality-rate (1.1% vs 3.8%; propensity-adjusted odds ratio (PAOR) = 0.11; p = 0.018) and displayed less frequent MACCE (8.3% vs 17.9%; PAOR = 0.66; p = 0.07) including myocardial infarction (1.3% vs 3.2%; PAOR = 0.33; p = 0.06) and stroke (0.7% vs 2.3%; PAOR = 0.28; p = 0.13). Similarly, a significantly lower occurrence of the noncardiac composite endpoint (MNCAE) (PAOR = 0.46; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.35-0.91; p < 0.001) was detected. In particular, lesser respiratory failure (0.9% vs 4.3%; PAOR = 0.24; p = 0.63) and pleural effusions (3.3% vs 7.5%; PAOR = 0.45; p = 0.04) occurred, so that fast extubation (≤ 12 h postoperative) was more frequently possible (58.3% vs 34.2%; PAOR = 1.64; p = 0.007). The number of arterial grafts was significantly higher among OPCAB patients (1.54 ± 0.89 vs 1.33 ± 0.81; p = 0.006) due to a more frequent use of the right-internal mammary artery (35.6% vs 22.9%; p < 0.001). ICOR was significantly higher among CABG patients (1.24 ± 0.34 vs 1.30 ± 0.28; p = 0.001). However, for similar proportions in both groups, an ICOR > 1 was achieved clearly indicating complete revascularization (94.3% vs 93.7%; p = 0.24).
CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB offers a lower mortality and superior postoperative outcomes in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Arterial grafts are used more frequently that may contribute to better long-term outcomes and the OPCAB approach does not come at the cost of less complete revascularization.
Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21167727     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  10 in total

1.  The current status of multi-arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Suzuki Tomoaki; Asai Tohru
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery among patients with type 2 diabetes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial.

Authors:  Ashima Singh; Hartzell V Schaff; Maria Mori Brooks; Mark A Hlatky; Stephen R Wisniewski; Robert L Frye; Edward Y Sako
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; is it Still Relevant?

Authors:  Chima K P Ofoegbu; Rodgers M Manganyi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

Review 4.  HEARTSTRING enabled no-touch proximal anastomosis for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: current evidence and technique.

Authors:  Maximilian Y Emmert; Jürg Grünenfelder; Jacques Scherman; Riccardo Cocchieri; Wim-Jan P van Boven; Volkmar Falk; Sacha P Salzberg
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-03

Review 5.  On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what do the evidence show?

Authors:  Alfredo José Rodrigues; Paulo Roberto Barbosa Evora; Paulo Victor Alves Tubino
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

6.  The Effects of Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Jinsong Han; Tao Liu; Zhonglu Yang; Hui Jiang; Huishan Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation; Why hasn't it convinced yet?

Authors:  Efstratios Apostolakis; Nikolaos A Papakonstantinou; Ioanna Koniari
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 8.  Can the onset of heart failure be delayed by treating diabetic cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Anna Marcinkiewicz; Stanisław Ostrowski; Józef Drzewoski
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.320

9.  Myocardial protection and early outcome of different coronary surgical techniques for diabetic patients with triple vessels.

Authors:  Yu Lei; Tianxiang Gu; Enyi Shi; Chun Wang; Fang Qin
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

Review 10.  Does off-pump coronary revascularization confer superior organ protection in re-operative coronary artery surgery? A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Amir H Sepehripour; Leanne Harling; Hutan Ashrafian; Roberto Casula; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.637

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.