PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of single focus prostate cancer in radical prostatectomies, its clinical relevance and the occurrence of TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1,100 radical prostatectomies and determined the tumor outline and number of cancer foci. When single focus prostate cancer was identified, we recorded pathological characteristics. We assessed ERG fusion status in a subset of cases. RESULTS: Single focus prostate cancer was identified in 106 radical prostatectomies. Median patient age was 59 years. Median prostate specific antigen was 5.1 ng/ml. Single focus cancer was unilateral in 81% of cases and 98% originated from the peripheral zone. Tumor volume was 0.1 to 3.9 cm(3) (median 0.5). Gleason score was 6 in 38% of patients, 7 in 40%, 8 or greater in 21% and undetermined in 2%. Extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicles invasion were detected in 30% and 2% of cases, respectively. Stage was pT2 in 62% of cases, pT2 with positive margin of resection in 7% and pT3 in 30%. ERG fusion was detected in 68% of tumors. Cases rearranged via deletion had significantly higher tumor volume. Three cases showed intratumor heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Single focus prostate cancer accounted for 9.6% of tumors. In most cases it involved 1 lobe of the gland and originated from the peripheral zone. Despite a trend toward high grade disease 62% of single focus prostate cancers were organ confined. Only 3 fusion positive cases showed intratumor heterogeneity, suggesting that most single focus cancer may evolve from a single clone of malignant cells. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of single focus prostate cancer in radical prostatectomies, its clinical relevance and the occurrence of TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1,100 radical prostatectomies and determined the tumor outline and number of cancer foci. When single focus prostate cancer was identified, we recorded pathological characteristics. We assessed ERG fusion status in a subset of cases. RESULTS: Single focus prostate cancer was identified in 106 radical prostatectomies. Median patient age was 59 years. Median prostate specific antigen was 5.1 ng/ml. Single focus cancer was unilateral in 81% of cases and 98% originated from the peripheral zone. Tumor volume was 0.1 to 3.9 cm(3) (median 0.5). Gleason score was 6 in 38% of patients, 7 in 40%, 8 or greater in 21% and undetermined in 2%. Extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicles invasion were detected in 30% and 2% of cases, respectively. Stage was pT2 in 62% of cases, pT2 with positive margin of resection in 7% and pT3 in 30%. ERG fusion was detected in 68% of tumors. Cases rearranged via deletion had significantly higher tumor volume. Three cases showed intratumor heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Single focus prostate cancer accounted for 9.6% of tumors. In most cases it involved 1 lobe of the gland and originated from the peripheral zone. Despite a trend toward high grade disease 62% of single focus prostate cancers were organ confined. Only 3 fusion positive cases showed intratumor heterogeneity, suggesting that most single focus cancer may evolve from a single clone of malignant cells. Copyright Â
Authors: Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Philip Rosen; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Stephen A Brassell; David G McLeod; Shiv Srivastava; Albert Dobi Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Anuradha Gopalan; Margaret A Leversha; Maria E Dudas; Alexandra C Maschino; Jeremy Chang; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine Journal: Histopathology Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Sung Han Kim; Soo Hee Kim; Jae Young Joung; Geon Kook Lee; Eun Kyung Hong; Kyung Min Kang; Ami Yu; Byung Ho Nam; Jinsoo Chung; Ho Kyung Seo; Weon Seo Park; Kang Hyun Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: B Gumuskaya; B Gurel; H Fedor; H-L Tan; C A Weier; J L Hicks; M C Haffner; T L Lotan; A M De Marzo Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: G Schaefer; J-M Mosquera; R Ramoner; K Park; A Romanel; E Steiner; W Horninger; J Bektic; M Ladurner-Rennau; M A Rubin; F Demichelis; H Klocker Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 5.554