Literature DB >> 21167528

Influence of pretreatment and treatment factors on intermediate to long-term outcome after prostate brachytherapy.

Nelson N Stone1, Mariana M Stone, Barry S Rosenstein, Pam Unger, Richard G Stock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe how treatment factors influence biochemical freedom from failure, local control, freedom from metastasis and cause specific survival in patients treated with prostate brachytherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We followed 2,111 men who underwent brachytherapy a median of 6 years (range 2 to 17). Median prostate specific antigen was 7 ng/ml. Of the men 1,455 (68.9%) had clinical stage T2a or less and 1,428 (67.6%) had Gleason score less than 7. A total of 1,171 patients (55.5%) received (125)I, 221 (10.4%) received (103)Pd and 719 (34.1%) received supplemental external beam irradiation combined with (103)Pd. Post-implant dosimetry was done 30 days after implantation with doses converted to the biologically effective dose. Prostate biopsy was done 2 years after permanent prostate brachytherapy in 586 men (27.8%). Survival functions were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression with proportions tested by the log rank test.
RESULTS: The 12-year biochemical freedom from failure rate was 78.6%, and stage, Gleason score, prostate specific antigen and biologically effective dose were significant predictors (p = 0.007, <0.001, 0.005 and <0.001, respectively). In 964 patients at low risk the biochemical freedom from failure rate was 88.1% and significant predictors were hormonal therapy (p = 0.030), prostate specific antigen (p = 0.026) and biologically effective dose (p = 0.003). In 499 patients at intermediate risk the biochemical freedom from failure rate was 79.2% with biologically effective dose a significant predictor (p <0.001). In 648 men at high risk the biochemical freedom from failure rate was 67% and significant predictors were hormonal therapy, Gleason score and biologically effective dose (p = 0.036, <0.001 and 0.012, respectively). The local failure rate was 7.3% with biologically effective dose a significant predictor (p <0.001). Prostate biopsy was positive in 21 of 121 cases (21.5%) for a biologically effective dose of 150 Gy2 or less, in 14 of 248 (5.6%) for greater than 150 to 200 Gy2 and in 3 of 193 (1.6%) for greater than 200 Gy2 (p <0.001). The 12-year freedom from metastasis rate was 95.2% with Gleason score a significant predictor (p <0.001). Cause specific survival at 12 years was 94.5% with Gleason score and biologically effective dose significant predictors (p <0.001 and 0.027, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Permanent prostate brachytherapy yields excellent long-term oncologic outcomes. High biologically effective dose may need to be delivered to achieve successful biochemical freedom from failure, local control and cause specific survival. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21167528     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  The best method for dose escalation: Prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Gerard Morton
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; L Egevad; M Amin; B Delahunt; J R Srigley; P A Humphrey; J I Epstein
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Brachytherapy: time to up the dose?

Authors:  Suzanne J Farley
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Update on prostate brachytherapy: long-term outcomes and treatment-related morbidity.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Jamie A Cesaretti; Nelson N Stone; Richard G Stock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Long-term outcome of magnetic resonance spectroscopic image-directed dose escalation for prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Martin T King; Nicola J Nasser; Nitin Mathur; Gil'ad N Cohen; Marisa A Kollmeier; Jasper Yuen; Hebert A Vargas; Xin Pei; Yoshiya Yamada; Kristen L Zakian; Marco Zaider; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  High Intensity Focused Ultrasound versus Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Ksenija Limani; Alexandre Peltier; Quentin Marcelis; Marc Zanaty; Alexandre Chamoun; Marc Vanden Bossche; Thierry Roumeguère; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-08-19

7.  Gum arabic-coated radioactive gold nanoparticles cause no short-term local or systemic toxicity in the clinically relevant canine model of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandra M Axiak-Bechtel; Anandhi Upendran; Jimmy C Lattimer; James Kelsey; Cathy S Cutler; Kim A Selting; Jeffrey N Bryan; Carolyn J Henry; Evan Boote; Deborah J Tate; Margaret E Bryan; Kattesh V Katti; Raghuraman Kannan
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-10-28

8.  Long term outcome and side effects in patients receiving low-dose I125 brachytherapy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Pieter Logghe; Rolf Verlinde; Frank Bouttens; Caroline Van den Broecke; Nathalie Deman; Koen Verboven; Dirk Maes; Luc Merckx
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)--a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009.

Authors:  Nobumichi Tanaka; Akihide Hirayama; Tatsuo Yoneda; Katsunori Yoshida; Keiji Shimada; Noboru Konishi; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jonathan Epstein
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.