Literature DB >> 21167325

Vascular invasion is not a risk factor in oesophageal cancer recurrence.

N Waraich1, F Rashid, A Jan, D Semararo, R Deb, P C Leeder, S Y Iftikhar.   

Abstract

AIM: The outcome of the treatment of oesophageal cancer remains poor despite improved treatment modalities and recurrence remains a major problem despite improved staging and treatment. The aim was to identify the independent risk factors responsible in the recurrence of oesophageal cancer.
METHODS: The patients who had elective oesophagectomy (n = 244) with curative intent were studied. One hundred and eighty four patients had surgery alone, 44 patients had neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery while 16 patients had neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. We have analyzed patients who had surgery alone (n = 184). Data was collected for demography, type of operation, histology, staging (TNM), vascular invasion (VI), differentiation of tumour, type of chemotherapy and recurrence of tumour.
RESULTS: The median age was 67 years (IQR 60, 71). The T1, T2, T3 distribution was 10%, 24% and 66% respectively. Forty percent had no nodal involvement (N0) and 60% had N1 stage disease. Twenty three percent of patients had vascular invasion. Univariate analysis of histo-pathological factors identified lymph node yield (p = 0.06), curative resection R0 (p = 0.004) and vascular invasion (VI) (P = 0.69) as prognostic indicators of recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that number of lymph nodes yielded (p = 0.01) and R0 resection remain independent indicators of recurrence of tumour. However, VI (p = 0.2) and age at disease onset (p = 0.8) were not indicators of recurrence in oesophageal cancer patients.
CONCLUSION: R0 and lymph node yield may help to predict the recurrence of oesophageal cancer. However the presence of VI may not be a significant risk factor in disease recurrence.
Copyright © 2010 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21167325     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  4 in total

1.  Lymphopenia predicts poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Feng Feng; Jin-Shi Liu; Ying Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Prognostic significance of the pN classification supplemented by vascular invasion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chong-Mei Zhu; Yi-Hong Ling; Shao-Yan Xi; Rong-Zhen Luo; Jie-Wei Chen; Jing-Ping Yun; Dan Xie; Mu-Yan Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The presence of lymphovascular and perineural infiltration after neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy identifies patients at high risk for recurrence.

Authors:  S M Lagarde; A W Phillips; M Navidi; B Disep; A Immanuel; S M Griffin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Lymphovascular invasion as an independent prognostic indicator in radically resected thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Peng Chen; Feng Wang; Liyan Lin; Shuoyan Liu
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.