Literature DB >> 21166714

Use of spatial capture-recapture modeling and DNA data to estimate densities of elusive animals.

Marc Kéry1, Beth Gardner, Tabea Stoeckle, Darius Weber, J Andrew Royle.   

Abstract

Assessment of abundance, survival, recruitment rates, and density (i.e., population assessment) is especially challenging for elusive species most in need of protection (e.g., rare carnivores). Individual identification methods, such as DNA sampling, provide ways of studying such species efficiently and noninvasively. Additionally, statistical methods that correct for undetected animals and account for locations where animals are captured are available to efficiently estimate density and other demographic parameters. We collected hair samples of European wildcat (Felis silvestris) from cheek-rub lure sticks, extracted DNA from the samples, and identified each animals' genotype. To estimate the density of wildcats, we used Bayesian inference in a spatial capture-recapture model. We used WinBUGS to fit a model that accounted for differences in detection probability among individuals and seasons and between two lure arrays. We detected 21 individual wildcats (including possible hybrids) 47 times. Wildcat density was estimated at 0.29/km² (SE 0.06), and 95% of the activity of wildcats was estimated to occur within 1.83 km from their home-range center. Lures located systematically were associated with a greater number of detections than lures placed in a cell on the basis of expert opinion. Detection probability of individual cats was greatest in late March. Our model is a generalized linear mixed model; hence, it can be easily extended, for instance, to incorporate trap- and individual-level covariates. We believe that the combined use of noninvasive sampling techniques and spatial capture-recapture models will improve population assessments, especially for rare and elusive animals. ©2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21166714     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01616.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.

Authors:  Joel S Ruprecht; Charlotte E Eriksson; Tavis D Forrester; Darren A Clark; Michael J Wisdom; Mary M Rowland; Bruce K Johnson; Taal Levi
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.105

2.  Estimating Population Size for Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) with Spatial Capture-Recapture Models Based on Genotypes from One Field Sample.

Authors:  Pierre Mollet; Marc Kéry; Beth Gardner; Gilberto Pasinelli; J Andrew Royle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance.

Authors:  Clay M Wilton; Emily E Puckett; Jeff Beringer; Beth Gardner; Lori S Eggert; Jerrold L Belant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Population size estimates based on the frequency of genetically assigned parent-offspring pairs within a subsample.

Authors:  Björn Müller; Moritz Mercker; Jörg Brün
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.

Authors:  J Terrill Paterson; Kelly Proffitt; Ben Jimenez; Jay Rotella; Robert Garrott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fragmentation and low density as major conservation challenges for the southernmost populations of the European wildcat.

Authors:  Jose María Gil-Sánchez; Jose Miguel Barea-Azcón; Javier Jaramillo; F Javier Herrera-Sánchez; José Jiménez; Emilio Virgós
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture-recapture modelling.

Authors:  Lars K Lindsø; Pierre Dupont; Lars Rød-Eriksen; Ida Pernille Øystese Andersskog; Kristine Roaldsnes Ulvund; Øystein Flagstad; Richard Bischof; Nina E Eide
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Testing the precision and sensitivity of density estimates obtained with a camera-trap method revealed limitations and opportunities.

Authors:  Pascal Pettigrew; Daniel Sigouin; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Identifying important conservation areas for the clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa in a mountainous landscape: Inference from spatial modeling techniques.

Authors:  Ugyen Penjor; David W Macdonald; Sonam Wangchuk; Tandin Tandin; Cedric Kai Wei Tan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  An improved understanding of ungulate population dynamics using count data: Insights from western Montana.

Authors:  J Terrill Paterson; Kelly Proffitt; Jay Rotella; Robert Garrott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.