Literature DB >> 21165871

Evaluating building performance in healthcare facilities: an organizational perspective.

Claudia Steinke1, Lynn Webster, Marie Fontaine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using the environment as a strategic tool is one of the most cost-effective and enduring approaches for improving public health; however, it is one that requires multiple perspectives. The purpose of this article is to highlight an innovative methodology that has been developed for conducting comprehensive performance evaluations in public sector health facilities in Canada.
BACKGROUND: The building performance evaluation methodology described in this paper is a government initiative. The project team developed a comprehensive building evaluation process for all new capital health projects that would respond to the aforementioned need for stakeholders to be more accountable and to better integrate the larger organizational strategy of facilities. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: The Balanced Scorecard, which is a multiparadigmatic, performance-based business framework, serves as the underlying theoretical framework for this initiative. It was applied in the development of the conceptual model entitled the Building Performance Evaluation Scorecard, which provides the following benefits: (1) It illustrates a process to link facilities more effectively to the overall mission and goals of an organization; (2) It is both a measurement and a management system that has the ability to link regional facilities to measures of success and larger business goals; (3) It provides a standardized methodology that ensures consistency in assessing building performance; and (4) It is more comprehensive than traditional building evaluations.
CONCLUSION: The methodology presented in this paper is both a measurement and management system that integrates the principles of evidence-based design with the practices of pre- and post-occupancy evaluation. It promotes accountability and continues throughout the life cycle of a project. The advantage of applying this framework is that it engages health organizations in clarifying a vision and strategy for their facilities and helps translate those strategies into action and measurable performance outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21165871     DOI: 10.1177/193758671000300207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HERD        ISSN: 1937-5867


  4 in total

1.  Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: end-user perceptions.

Authors:  Mauricio Ferri; David A Zygun; Alexandra Harrison; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments-time to begin improving quality.

Authors:  Marie Elf; Peter Fröst; Göran Lindahl; Helle Wijk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A study protocol for performance evaluation of a new academic intensive care unit facility: impact on patient care.

Authors:  Mauricio Ferri; David A Zygun; Alexandra Harrison; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A comparative study of patients' activities and interactions in a stroke unit before and after reconstruction-The significance of the built environment.

Authors:  Anna Anåker; Lena von Koch; Christina Sjöstrand; Julie Bernhardt; Marie Elf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.